Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 887 of 2019 Petitioner :- Maiyadeen Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Keshaw Prasad Shukla,Shyam Narayan Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brij Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri K.P. Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel as well as Sri Brij Kumar Yadav, Advocate for respondents.
2. Grievance of petitioner is basically against Gram Pradhan of Gaon Sabha Salarpur. It is alleged that he is making various illegalities in providing benefit of Government Social Scheme to Gram Panchayat.
3. In these matters if there is any illegality or irregularity on the part of Gram Pradhan, there is a full fledged procedure for inquiry prescribed in U.P Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules 1997 (hereinafter referred to as "Rules, 1997") , therefore, petitioner must avail remedy thereunder.
4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019 AK