Court No. - 18
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5979 of 2018 Petitioner :- Maimuna Respondent :- Vinod Kumar And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Mishra,Anil Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to private respondents.
The plaintiff-petitioner is before this Court for a direction to third respondent to decide 6-C application of the plaintiff- petitioner in Original Suit No.126 of 2018 (Maimuna v. Vinod Kumar & Ors.) within stipulated period.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to third respondent to consider and decide the aforesaid 6-C application in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 SP/