Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Mahuva Nagarpalika Through Chief ... vs Rule Served For

High Court Of Gujarat|01 October, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned advocate for the applicants seeks to delete the names of unserved expired respondents i.e. Respondents No.2, 4, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21 and 24.
The above respondents stands deleted at the instance of the applicants.
This application is for condonation of delay of 8 days occurred in filing above mentioned Second Appeal.
I have heard learned advocate Mr.K. R. Mishra for the applicants and learned advocate Ms.Vinita Vinayak for M/s.Thakkar Associates for the respondent No.1. Other respondents are already served.
Considering the explanation given in the application, I am HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Fri Nov 27 00:30:31 IST 2015 CA/6598/2012 2/2 ORDER satisfied that the applicants have made out sufficient grounds which prevented the applicants from filing the second appeal within prescribed time limit. I, accordingly, allow this application and condone the delay of 8 days occurred in filing the Second Appeal. Application stands disposed of.
[ C. L. SONI, J. ] vijay HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Fri Nov 27 00:30:31 IST 2015
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahuva Nagarpalika Through Chief ... vs Rule Served For

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
01 October, 2012