Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and even necessity to treat the petitioner is realized by the Department of Home, State of Gujarat, and, therefore, expected medical expense to be incurred for treatment of the petitioner in a private hospital is called for as per communication dated 10.2.2012, since restrictions are imposed under Section 268(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, respondent No.2 shall file an affidavit and explain why restrictions imposed under Section 268(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 be not removed for administering proper medical treatment to the petitioner at the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad.
S.O.
To 7.3.2012.
Copy of this order be given to the learned APP.
(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top