Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Mahmood Razza Khan {Now Division} vs State Of U.P. Through Secy.Rural ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Dr. Satish Chandra,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Mr.M.E. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole has expired.
However, learned Standing Counsel submits that by efflux of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.2.2012 lakshman
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahmood Razza Khan {Now Division} vs State Of U.P. Through Secy.Rural ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2012
Judges
  • Rajiv Sharma
  • Satish Chandra

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.