Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Maheshwar Kumar vs Union Of India And 4 Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 March, 2016

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Sri Gaurav Kumar Chand has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents.
It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that in his application form he has mentioned that he belongs to scheduled caste category and he has submitted his caste certificate of the scheduled caste category. He has been found successful in the recruitment process and appointment letter has been issued to him on 10.06.2015.
The petitioner claims that he has joined at Bhopal. During verification of documents, some discrepancy has been found with regard to the petitioner as in some of the documents of the Selection Board, the petitioner's category has been mentioned as scheduled tribe. For the correction of the said discrepancy/error, he has moved a representation to the respondent no.2.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5 may seek instruction in the matter what steps have been taken to rectify the said mistake.
Put up this case as supplementary fresh on 25.04.2016.
Order Date :- 30.3.2016 AU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Maheshwar Kumar vs Union Of India And 4 Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 March, 2016
Judges
  • Pradeep Kumar Baghel