Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mahendra vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8937 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mahendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhanshu Narain,Shyam Narain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
In Re: Amendment Application No. Nill of 2019 Application is allowed.
Let the necessary amendment to be carried out within two days.
In Re: Writ Petition Heard learned counsel for the parties.
By the instant writ petition, petitioner seeks the following relief:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 12.10.2018 of the petitioner which was filed (Annexure No. 12) to this writ petition."
Learned Standing Counsel submits that the second respondent shall consider and decide the claim of the petitioner expeditiously.
In regard thereto, without entering into the merit of the case, as well as, rival contentions raised by the respective parties, it is provided that the second respondent, Divisional Director Social Forestry, Droria, shall consider and decide the claim/representation of the petitioner, by a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously, preferably, within three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order along with the copy of the writ petition.
With the aforementioned observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 S.Prakash
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahendra vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • Sudhanshu Narain Shyam Narain