Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mahendra Kumar Rastogi vs District Magistrate And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 5475 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Rastogi Respondent :- District Magistrate And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Veerendra Kumar Shukla,Ramendra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
By means of this writ petition, an order dated 28.09.2018 passed in a transfer application under Rule 65 of the Consolidation of Holdings, Rules filed by the petitioner is under challenge. The order impugned is by the Collector / District Deputy Director of Consolidation, Badaun.
It appears that after filing the application, the petitioner absented himself and therefore, the impugned order has been passed.
In my considered opinion, in case the petitioner is aggrieved, he should file a restoration application before the authority concerned, which has passed the order.
Subject to the above, this writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.10.2018 RKM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahendra Kumar Rastogi vs District Magistrate And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 October, 2018
Judges
  • Anjani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Veerendra Kumar Shukla Ramendra Pal Singh