Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mahesh Chandra Gupta And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 38034 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra Gupta And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Kumar Singh,Dharnidhar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Binod Kumar Vishwakarma
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Heard Sri Kamal Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Binod Kumar Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the caveator as well as Sri J.P. Tipathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 12.12.2018 registered as case crime no. 937 of 2018 under sections 498-A, 307, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act, police station Tilhar, District Shahjahanpur.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the impugned FIR has been lodged by the respondent no. 3 roping in the entire family of her husband, petitioner no. 1 containing absolutely false, concocted, vague and sweeping allegations against them that they were demanding dowry from her and her parents and on account of non fulfilment of the alleged demands of dowry she was being tortured and maltreated by them in her matrimonial home. It has next been submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the FIR no credible evidence whatsoever is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the petitioners' complicity in the commission of the alleged offence qua the petitioner nos. 2 to 6 hence the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.
Per contra learned AGA for the State submitted that the impugned FIR is not liable to be quashed on the basis of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
After having heard learned counsel for the parties present and perused the impugned FIR as well as the other material brought on record, we dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:
(i) Investigation of the aforesaid case shall go on but the petitioner nos. 2 to 6 shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case till the submission of police report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., subject to their cooperation during investigation.
(ii) As far as the petitioner no. 1 is concerned, the petition stand dismissed.
With this direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
(Raj Beer Singh,J) (Ramesh Sinha,J.) Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Manoj
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahesh Chandra Gupta And Others vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Kamal Kumar Singh Dharnidhar Pandey