Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mahavir Singh vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24374 of 2018
Petitioner :- Mahavir Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Dutt Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri K.D.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Gambhir Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 14.8.2018, arising out of F.I.R. No.504 of 2018, under Sections 452, 354 I.P.C.,P.S. Gunnaur, District Bheem Nagra. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with malafide intention.He further submitted that earlier an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was moved by the wife of petitioner against the husband of respondent no.3 for lodging an FIR against him, on account of which the impugned FIR has been lodged against the petitioner levelling absolutely false, frivolous and baseless allegations though no offence is made out against the petitioner, hence, FIR is liable to be quashed.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 5.9.2018/NS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahavir Singh vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Krishna Dutt Tiwari