Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Mahaveer Joot Mill Shiv Shakti ... vs State Of U.P. And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 November, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mahabir Jute Mills claim that on their complaint, the petitioner's registration has been cancelled. Therefore, they are the necessary party and should be impleaded.
Let the petitioner may implead Mahabir Jute Mills as respondent no. 3 during the course of the day. The newly respondent no. 3 is represented by Sri Vinod Swarup, Advocate. He prays for and is granted a week's time to file counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 are represented by learned Standing Counsel. They may also file counter by that time.
Put up on 4.12.2012 as fresh before the appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 26.11.2012 OP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahaveer Joot Mill Shiv Shakti ... vs State Of U.P. And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 November, 2012
Judges
  • Rajes Kumar