Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Mahamad vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|22 May, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Rule.
Learned APP, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I-107 of 2012 with Fatehganj Police Station, District: Vadodara, for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 364(a), 365, 386, 387, 392, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that co-accused namely, Munaf Mustakbhai Sheikh and Paresh @ Bhuriyo Shankarbhai Makwana are enlarged on bail in exercise of powers under Sections 439 of the Code by the Coordinate Bench vide order dated 4.5.2012 and 10.5.2012 passed in Criminal Misc. Application Nos. 5298 and 6354 of 2012 respectively and considering the role of the applicant, this application for bail may kindly be considered by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Heard learned APP for the respondent - State who opposed grant of bail looking to the nature and gravity of offence.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case and taking into consideration the above facts, nature of allegations, role attributed to the accused and punishment prescribed for the alleged offences and parity claimed, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail.
6. Learned counsel for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.
7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I-107 of 2012 with Fatehganj Police Station, District: Vadodara, on executing a bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;
(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;
(e) mark presence at the concerned police station on the first Sunday of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. for three months only;
(f) furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
8. The Authorities will release the applicant only if not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
9. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case.
11. For modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions herein above, the applicant/s will be at liberty to approach the concerned Court and such Court shall decide the application for modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions of this order in accordance with law.
12. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
13. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. D.S. Permitted.
(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) //smita// Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mahamad vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
22 May, 2012