Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13964 of 2003 Petitioner :- Mahadev Prasad Respondent :- The Chief Development Officer Auraiya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.M. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs :
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 20.12.2001 and 20.7.2002 and 9.12.2002 passed by the respondents (as Annexure no.1, 2, 3 to this writ petition).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to recover the amount of Rs.18149/- from the petitioner.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents so they may not adopt any coercive measures against the petitioner.
(iv) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
(v) To award the cost of the petition to the petitioner."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018
Manish Himwan