Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Maduranthagi Natchiyar vs The Special Commissioner & Commissioner Of Land Administration And Others

Madras High Court|25 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in a similar writ petition filed by one Devi and Lalitha in W.P.No.36216 of 2003, this Court, by order dated 17.04.2012, has dismissed the said writ petition by observing in paragraph Nos.24, 25 and 26 as under:
''24. Under the circumstances, it has to be seen whether the petitioners have made out any case for interference.
25. In the present case, the petitioners made a very faint attempt to challenge a notification issued by the Forest Department reserving the land as Reserve Forest. Subsequently, as categorically held, no pattas can be granted in respect of a notified reserve forest. The petitioners attempt to go before the Inam Abolition Authority for claiming patta long after the settlement proceedings are over is totally unacceptable and beyond the limitation period under the provisions of the Act. The petitioners have not made out any case to establish their entitlement for Ryotwari patta in respect of the notified forest which during the proceedings were notified as 'Forest Poramboke'. Not only the petitioners are guilty of delay and laches but also they have not established any legal right to claim the land in question. The Director of Forest and Settlement rightly set aside the order of the Assistant Settlement Officer, Madurai and Assistant Settlement Officer, Thanjavur as it is not within their province, an application beyond the prescribed time by the State Government.''
26. Under the said circumstances, there is no case made out to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.
2. In the light of the above cited decision, both the writ petitions are dismissed. No costs.
25.01.2017 Index:Yes / No Internet:Yes / No ssn D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J., ssn To
1. The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
2. The Director of Survey & Settlements, Chennai-5.
3. The Land Settlement Officer, Thanjavur.
4. The Assistant Land Settlement Officer, Madurai.
5. The District Forest Officer, Ramnad-cum-P.M.T.Forest Division, Sivagangai-630 501.
W.P.Nos.384 and 686 of 2011 25.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Maduranthagi Natchiyar vs The Special Commissioner & Commissioner Of Land Administration And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 January, 2017
Judges
  • D Krishnakumar