Amit Kumar vs The Commissioner And Others
Judges: M Duraiswamy
12 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.24438 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.25825 of 2017 Amit Kumar ... Petitioner v.1. The Commissioner, Chennai City Municipal Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai – 600 003.2. Th...
Madras High Court
N Raghavulu Naidu vs The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: G Jayachandran
12 September, 2017·This petition has been filed praying to quash the final report SPE/CBI/ACB, Chennai, RC MA.1/2015 A 0023 and the resultant charge sheet in C.C.No.20 of 2017 on the file of the XIV Additional Special Court for CBI http://www.judis.nic.inCases, Chennai.2. Gist of the Final Report is as follows:-Feud ...
Madras High Court
M Paneer [ vs The Inspector Of Police Vaniyambadi Rural Police Station Vaniyambadi T K
Judges: M Duraiswamy
12 September, 2017·Mr.S.N.Parthasarathi, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondent.2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider his representation dated 06.09.2017 and grant permission to him in order to conduct the c...
Madras High Court
R Prabhakaran [ ] vs The Chairman Tangedco Anna Salai Chennai 002 2 The Executive Engineer ( Execution/Maintenance ) Tamilnadu Electricity Board Panayapuram Po Vikaravandi Taluk Villupuram District [
Judges: M Duraiswamy
12 September, 2017·Mr.Varun Kumar, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writs of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of his rep...
Madras High Court
G Karuppaiyan vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
12 September, 2017·The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for the following relief:''To issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the third respondent in connection with the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.437 of 2010 dated 17.10.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct t...
Madras High Court
Pastor C.Samuel Raj vs The Executive Officer
Judges:
12 September, 2017·PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned notice in Na.Ka.No.388/2016 dated 07.08.2017 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and further dir...
Madras High Court
A Bakiyalakshmi vs The Secretary To Government Home And Others
Judges: A Selvam, P Kalaiyarasan
12 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 12.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.827 of 2017 A.Bakiyalakshmi .. Petitioner Vs1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat ...
Madras High Court
P Jayaprakash vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
12 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.09.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.32897 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.39809 & 39810 of 2004 P. Jayaprakash ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Local Developmen...
Madras High Court
V Thangavelu S/O P Vaidyanathan vs T Muruganantham No 4 And Others
Judges: C V Karthikeyan
12 September, 2017·THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN C.S.No.106 of 2017 V.Thangavelu S/o.P.Vaidyanathan, No.20-A, Dhnalakshmi Nagar, Iyyappanthangal, Chennai - 600 056.Lessee - Raja Rajan Theatre, Thanjavur. ...Plaintiff ..Vs..1. T.Muruganantham No.4, Annai Indira Nagar, K.K. Nagar, Chennai - 600 078.2. S...
Madras High Court
P M Nanjundasamy vs The Secretary To Government Rural Devlopment Dept And Others
Judges: M Dhandapani
12 September, 2017·When the matter was listed on 18.08.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter was ordered to be posted next week. Thereafter, when the matter was called on 05.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be posted on 12.0...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.