Sms Limited vs Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Judges:
14 September, 2017·PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the impugned proceedings of the respondent passed in CST No.528662/2015-2016 dated 15.05.2017 and quash the same and further direct the respondent to grant a...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.19202 Of 2017 vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
14 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register a case based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 08.06.2017 and investigate the same according to law.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of the...
Madras High Court
A.L.Gangadharan vs The Co-Operative Appellate ...
Judges:
14 September, 2017·This writ petition has been filed seeking to set aside the Judgment & Decree dated 12.03.2003 made in C.M.A. No.2 of 2002 by the first respondent and the Award dated 04.08.2000 made in A.R.C.No.1/99-2000 on the file of the 2nd respondent.2. The brief facts of the case is as follows :The petitioner i...
Madras High Court
S. Aravindhan vs Union Of India
Judges:
14 September, 2017·This writ petition has been filed for issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Online Entrance Examination conducted by the 2nd respondent Institute by issuing the Addendum Document to the JIPMER MBBS Entrance Examination 2016 Prospectus dated 10.3.2016 in 2...
Madras High Court
R.Shanmugasundaram vs The District Elementary ...
Judges:
14 September, 2017·The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the respondent dated 08.02.2011 in Na.Ka.No.7485/A1/2010 and the order of the respondent dated 12.04.2011 in Moo.Mu.No.1103/A1/2011 and quash the same an...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.19134 Of 2017 vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
14 September, 2017·It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police have been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.2.An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfetter...
Madras High Court
Kumudavalli (Deceased) vs C.K.Pattabiraman
Judges:
14 September, 2017·The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the Judgment and decree dated 29.11.2011 made in I.A.No.749 of 2007 in O.S.No.688 of 1982 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ponneri.2. The petitioners 1 and 2 are the plaintiffs and respondents are the defendants in O.S.No.688 of 1982. The third p...
Madras High Court
D.Oliver vs The Registrar
Judges:
14 September, 2017·Challenge in this writ Petition is to the order of the first respondent in his proceedings No.TNTEU/Elig/2016/188.2. The case of petitioner is that he passed in 10th standard in the year 2005, then, he appeared for +2 examination in September 2007. Since he failed in the +2 examination, he joined in...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.19268 Of 2017 vs The Commissioner Of Police
Judges:
14 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to register a case based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 03.08.2017 and investigate the same according to law.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of...
Madras High Court
Pon Mayil Construction vs Commercial Tax Officer
Judges:
14 September, 2017·abr To1.The Commercial Tax Officer, Chidambaram-II Assessment Circle, Chidambaram-608 001.2.The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.W.P.Nos.23558 to 23562 of 2017 14.09.2017...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.