In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
15 September, 2017·It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police have been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.2.An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfetter...
Madras High Court
A.Loganathan vs R.Baby
Judges:
15 September, 2017·It is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent that the order passed in the writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.8820 of 2016 dated 29.04.2016 has been complied with.2.Recording the above submission, the contempt petition is closed. However, a liberty is given to ...
Madras High Court
J.Pradeep Kumar vs Tara Chand Bhandari
Judges:
15 September, 2017·The Review Application is filed to review the order dated 20.03.2012 passed in C.R.P.(PD) No.4141 of 2010. This Court closed the said Civil Revision Petition recording the joint compromise memo dated 14.03.2012. V.M.VELUMANI, J.kj2. According to the petitioner, his signature in the compromise memo w...
Madras High Court
D.Vaithyanathan vs State Represented By
Judges:
15 September, 2017·This appeal arises against judgment of learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chidambaram, passed in S.C.No.494 of 2007 on 28.02.2013.2. Prosecution case is that on 10.06.2003 when prosecution party went to Court at Katturmannarkoil towards complying with a condition of bail imposed on t...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.19330 Of 2017 vs The State Rep By
Judges:
15 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register a case based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 01.09.2017 against the named persons in the complaint.2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on ...
Madras High Court
M.Sakthivel vs Tamil Nadu Public Service ...
Judges:
15 September, 2017·The relief as sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner (Reg.No.010001009) for appointment to the post of Superintendent, Garments and Holdall Making Unit, Vellore, (Post Code No.3014) (2015-2016) treating the educational qual...
Madras High Court
Arunachala Thevar vs The District Collector
Judges:
15 September, 2017·When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 11.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the Writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 12.09.2017. Today (15.09.2017), when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no represen...
Madras High Court
The Gandhi Nagar Club vs B.Venkatesh Alias ...
Judges:
15 September, 2017·AND ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.kk O.S.A.Nos.231 to 242 of 2017 and C.M.P.Nos.15759 to 15774 of 2017 15.09.2017...
Madras High Court
R.Bommuraj vs The Collector
Judges:
15 September, 2017·When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 08.09.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ petition was directed to be listed 'for dismissal' next week. Today (15.09.2017), when the writ petition is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petition...
Madras High Court
G.K.Thambi vs Perumal Gounder
Judges:
15 September, 2017·dm/kj COMMON ORDER The Review Applications are filed to review the order dated 24.01.2003 made in C.R.P.Nos.526 and 527 of 2002.2. A reading of the order sought to be reviewed reveals that there is no error apparent in the order. Under these circumstances, the Review Applications are dismissed. No c...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.