R V Kuppusamy vs R Rangaraj
Judges: M Govindaraj
18 September, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the non disposal of injunction application in I.A.No.261 of 2017 in O.S.No.56 of 2017 on the file of Principal District Court, Villupuram.2. The petitioner is the plaintiff. He has filed four suits for recovery of money on promissory notes to the tune...
Madras High Court
K Selvi vs The Commissioner Corporation Of Chennai Ripon Building Chennai 600 003 2 The Executive Engineer Corporation Of Chennai Zone Xi
Judges: M Duraiswamy
18 September, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.09.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.24265 of 2017 & W.M.P.Nos.25650 & 25651 of 2017 K.Selvi ...Petitioner v.1 The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Ripon Building Chennai-600 0032 The Executive E...
Madras High Court
P A Vaithialingam vs The Puducherry Cooperative Housing Society And Others
Judges: D Krishnakumar
18 September, 2017·According to the petitioner, he has obtained loan for the purpose of construction of house building. Subsequently, there was a default in payment of the arrears of loan amount. Hence, for the petitioner has acquired the loan and paid Rs.14,12,524/-. The Principal amount is Rs.3,91,000/- and by calcu...
Madras High Court
S.Sokkanathan vs Ramar Ammal
Judges:
18 September, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner is present and there is no representation for the respondent.2.The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.3.In the light of the above position ...
Madras High Court
S.Ashok Kumar vs The Principal
Judges:
18 September, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect in the case bundle.2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdraw...
Madras High Court
M/S.Tamil Nadu Enterprises vs The Commissioner Of Food Safety
Judges:
18 September, 2017·The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition to quash the notification of the 1st respondent, dated 23.05.2017 as illegal in so far as ''Chewing Tobacco'' is concerned.2.Heard Mr.K.R.Laxman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.G.Muthukannan, learned Government Advocate for the res...
Madras High Court
S S Senthil Arumugam vs The Prinicpal Secretary To Government And Others
Judges: V Parthiban
18 September, 2017·Heard Mr.Ravi Shanmugam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.L.Mahendran, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioner has approached this Court for seeking the following relief, “To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records per...
Madras High Court
C.Lalitha vs The Executive Officer
Judges:
18 September, 2017·PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent dated 28.06.2017 quash the same as the same is arbitrary, ultravires, in violation of principles of natural justice, audi altera...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.19549 Of 2017 vs State : The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
18 September, 2017·This petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register a case based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 08.08.2017 and investigate the same according to law.2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.3.The grievance of the...
Madras High Court
Akhil Sebatian vs State By Inspector Of Police
Judges:
18 September, 2017·This petition has been filed to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners on 06.02.2017 in Crl.M.P.No.530 of 2017 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Poonamallee.2. On the complaint lodged by Fayaz Rizvi, the respondent police has registered a case in Crime No.139 of 2017 on 04.0...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.