J Uma Maheswari vs P Soundararajan
Judges: C T Selvam, M V Muralidaran
05 October, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARANC.M.A.No.3119 of 2013and MP.No.1 of 2013J.Uma Maheswari P.Soundararajan Vs... Appellant .. Respondent Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under Section 19 of Family Court Act, against the fair and decreetal ...
Madras High Court
Tony Abraham And Others vs Uma Keshav
Judges: M V Muralidaran
05 October, 2017·The petitioner has filed this Criminal Original Petition to call for the Records pending in C.C.No.279 of 2010 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee.2. The instant Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioners herein/accused to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.279 ...
Madras High Court
M/S Vira Constructions Company And Others vs Suresh B Mirpuri
Judges: M V Muralidaran
05 October, 2017·Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.ub2. Recording the said submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil R...
Madras High Court
Parthasarathy vs S Radhakrishnan
Judges: M V Muralidaran
05 October, 2017·The petitioner has filed this Criminal Original Petition to call for the records in C.C.No.111 of 2009 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengelpet and to quash the same.http://www.judis.nic.in2. The case of the petitioner is that he serves in Tamil Nadu State Police and in the year 2007...
Madras High Court
The Special Tahsildar (Adw) vs Sanku
Judges:
05 October, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2003 made in L.A.C.M.A.No.33/2000 on the file of the Sub Court, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.2.MP(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2015 have been filed to condone the delay of 3697 days in filing the petition to set aside...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.No.20894 Of 2017 vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
05 October, 2017·2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a complaint given by him on 18.09.2017 to the first respondent, the same has been kept in abeyance without an...
Madras High Court
R.H.Sakunthala vs The Authorised Officer
Judges:
05 October, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J) Guarantor has challenged possession notice, dated 7/9/2004, issued under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.2. Record of proceeding does not indicate any interim order.3. On 24/7/2017, when the matter was listed before the learned Single Judge, t...
Madras High Court
R Aravindhan And Others vs The Management Of Coromandel Leathers P Limited No 72 Harrington Road Chetpet Chennai 600 031 And Others
Judges: S Manikumar, R Suresh Kumar
05 October, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J) When Canara Bank, Chennai/second respondent, desired to take possession of the property, mortgaged by the Management of Coromandel Leathers (P) Ltd., Chennai, the borrower, contending inter alia that workers due have not been paid, employees of the fir...
Madras High Court
T Dhinakaran ( Minor ) ( Son Of Thilak Kumar @ Pandian Rep By Next Friend And Grandmother Mrs Vijaya And Others vs V Ranganathan And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
05 October, 2017·The Petitioners herein are Plaintiffs in an original suit in O.S.No.26 of 2005, on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam. They have approached this Court to set aside the order passed in an unnumbered Criminal Appeal No…… of 2008 dated 30.12.2008 on the file of th...
Madras High Court
R H Sakunthala vs The Authorised Officer Indian Overseas Bank Sowcarpet Branch Sowcarpet Chennai 600 079
Judges: S Manikumar, R Suresh Kumar
05 October, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J) Guarantor has challenged possession notice, dated 7/9/2004, issued under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.2. Record of proceeding does not indicate any interim order.3. On 24/7/2017, when the matter was listed before the learned Single Judge, t...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.