R Syed Mustafa Revision vs J Sabiroon
Judges: S Vimala
13 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 13.11.2017CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.R.C.No.1098 of 2017 R.Syed Mustafa Revision Petitioner / Complainant -vs-J.Sabiroon ... Respondent/Accused Prayer: Revision filed under Section 398...
Madras High Court
M.Muthu vs The Director Of School Education
Judges:
13 November, 2017·In view of the subsequent developments that had taken place after filing the writ petition, the petitioner was permitted vide order dated 06.11.2017 to amend the relief sought as follows:?For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a ...
Madras High Court
Mangayarkarasi vs The District Revenue Officer
Judges:
13 November, 2017·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the proceedings of the first respondent dated 20.07.2014 and to direct the first respondent to restore the patta No.2989 in Survey No.476/3B2, Veliyathur Village, Thriuppathur Taluk, Sivagangai D...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges:
13 November, 2017·It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police have been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.2. An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfette...
Madras High Court
T.Usha Kumari vs Government Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
13 November, 2017·The relief sought for in this writ petition is to quash the order of rejection in relation to the claim of the writ petitioner for medical reimbursement.2.The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner states that the writ petitioner is working as B.T.Assistant (History) in Government Higher ...
Madras High Court
V.Vedamuthu vs Tmt.T.Sabeetha
Judges:
13 November, 2017·The contempt petition has been filed to punish the Respondents herein for deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.22501 of 2015, dated 15.12.2015.2. Heard Mr.A.Ajith Geethan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned Special Government Ple...
Madras High Court
M.Elumalai vs S.Silambarasan
Judges:
13 November, 2017·On 07.05.2015, a dispute arose with respect to breaking of the Hundi of local Ayyanar temple and right to worship between caste Hindus and members of the Dalit community in the village, in which both sides sustained injuries.2. On the complaint given by one Elumalai, the police registered a case in ...
Madras High Court
R.Chinnathambi vs P.R.Selvam
Judges:
13 November, 2017·The defendant is the appellant. The suit was filed by the Plaintiff for specific performance and the same was dismissed by the trial Court and on appeal, the same was reversed. Aggrieved by the same, the above appeal is preferred.2. The suit properties and other properties belong to Plaintiff, defen...
Madras High Court
G.Shanmugam vs G.Satheesh
Judges:
13 November, 2017·For the sake of convenience, the petitioner and the respondent will be referred to as the complainant and the accused respectively.2. The complainant has initiated a prosecution in C.C.No.145 of 2013 against the accused for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, in which, the le...
Madras High Court
Lingesan vs R Ravi
Judges: D Krishnakumar
13 November, 2017·THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR C.R.P.(PD).No.4041 of 2017and C.M.P.No.18888 of 2017 Lingesan .. Petitioner Vs.R.Ravi .. Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the J...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.