M Rajarajan S/O Mathivanan vs The Regional Officer And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·The petitioner had completed 10th standard under CBSE stream. The mark sheet was issued by CBSE showing the petitioner's mother's name as “Usharani.M”, whereas her correct initial is “Usharani.N” which was not noted by the petitioner or by his parents. Thereafter, the petitioner continued education...
Madras High Court
Bhuvaneswari Tex vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28-11-2017 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.No.28048 of 2016 and WMP.No.24204 of 2016 Bhuvaneswari Tex, Rep. by its Manager - Mr.R.Gnanasekaran, No.225/3, Palladam Road, Arulpuram Post, Palladam Taluk, Tamilnadu-641 605. ...
Madras High Court
Bhuvaneswari Tex ( Branch I ) vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28-11-2017 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.No.28050 of 2016 and WMP.No.24206 of 2016 Bhuvaneswari Tex (Branch-I), Rep. by its Manager – Mr.R.Gnanasekaran, No.:266/2C, N.S.K.Nagar, TKT Mill Near, Palladam Road, Karaipudur Village, V...
Madras High Court
Everglade ( Div Of Shakthi Knitting Limited ) vs State Of Tamilnadu And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the G.O.(2D).No.59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department, dated 10.10.2014 contending that the petitioner is differently placed as a Hosiery manufacturer and not a tailoring industry.2. According to the petitioner, the petitione...
Madras High Court
Sai Saran Reddy Aged About 16 Years Represented By Father And Natural Guardian Mr Kotam Reddy Giridhar Reddy vs Central Board Of Secondary Education And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition challenging the order of the first respondent dated 24.08.2017 by which the petitioner's request for correction of his name in the Grade Sheet cum Certificate of Performance was rejected as the same is not found to be in consonance w...
Madras High Court
Phoeniix vs State Of Tamilnadu And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the G.O.(2D).No.59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department, dated 10.10.2014 contending that the petitioner is differently placed as a Hosiery manufacturer and not a tailoring industry.2. According to the petitioner, the petitione...
Madras High Court
Sunrise Knitting Mills vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28-11-2017 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.No.34456 of 2016 & W.M.P.No.29680 of 2016 Sunrise Knitting Mills, Represented by its Partner, R.Doraisamy, Plot No.D1, D2, Nethaji Apparel Park, Eetiveerampalayam, New Tirupur – 641 666. ...
Madras High Court
Vee Bee Garments vs State Of Tamilnadu Represented By Its Secretary And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28-11-2017 CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN W.P.No.33385 of 2016 & W.M.P.No.28832 of 2016 Vee Bee Garments, Rep by its Proprietor – Mr.S.R.Satheeswaran, SF.No.111, Adappukattu Thottam, Sedapalayam Road, Arulpuram Post, Tirupur, Tamilnad...
Madras High Court
Frontier Knitters Pvt Ltd – E Unit Rep By Its Manager Chacko Mathew vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the G.O.(2D).No.59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department, dated 10.10.2014 contending that the petitioner is differently placed as a Hosiery manufacturer and not a tailoring industry.2. According to the petitioner, the petitione...
Madras High Court
Sudhama Hosieries vs State Of Tamilnadu And Others
Judges: N Kirubakaran
28 November, 2017·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the G.O.(2D).No.59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department, dated 10.10.2014 contending that the petitioner is differently placed as a Hosiery manufacturer and not a tailoring industry.2. According to the petitioner, the petitione...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.