M.Ezhumalai vs The Tahsildar
Judges:
10 March, 2017·Mr.M.Elumalai, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2. The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondents to release the Tipper Lorry bearing Regn...
Madras High Court
M/S.Icici Lombard General ... vs S.Satish @ Satish Kumar
Judges:
10 March, 2017·Judgement of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam,J.,) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the Insurance Company against the judgment and decree, dated 12.03.2013, made in M.C.O.P.No.2466 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, VI Small Causes Court, Chenn...
Madras High Court
R.Ramadhas vs The Managing Director
Judges:
10 March, 2017·The petitioner was employed as Junior Tradesman in the respondents Corporation and he retired from service on 30.04.2016, on reaching the age of superannuation.2.He has filed this Writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.3.The First Bench of this Court ...
Madras High Court
M/S.Veeraraghava Textiles ... vs Appellate Authority For
Judges:
10 March, 2017·Mr.R.Akilesh, learned counsel representing the counsel on record, Mr.N.Maninarayanan would submit that this writ petition has become infructuous as the matter has been settled out of Court. In view of the submission made and the endorsement made to this effect, this writ petition is closed. No costs...
Madras High Court
Sivananaintha Perumal Nadar vs The Director
Judges:
10 March, 2017·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned proceedings in M.M.No.28992/EEJ2/2001 dated 20.08.2001 on the file of the first respondent.2.Aggrieved by the order dated 20.08.2001, bringing the petitioner school under direct payment, the above writ petition has been fil...
Madras High Court
P.Kaja Kamaludeen vs The State Rep. By
Judges:
10 March, 2017·Learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent on instruction submitted that the investigation in Crime No.17 of 2015 on the file the first respondent has been completed and final report has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil on 12.08.2015.2.Recording ...
Madras High Court
Maragatham vs Muthu
Judges:
10 March, 2017·Challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal, in M.C.O.P.No.457 of 2011, on 30-07-2013, the claimant has come forward with this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials on record.3. A perusal of...
Madras High Court
Machagandhi vs P.Ashok
Judges:
10 March, 2017·When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant has sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA,J arr2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the ...
Madras High Court
Balamani vs Mayilvel
Judges:
10 March, 2017·The above second appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree, dated 17.07.1997, passed in A.S.No.65 of 1996, on the file of the 2nd Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruchirapalli, reversing the Judgment and Decree, dated 26.04.1995, passed in O.S.No.797 of 1987, on the file of the District Munsif, Ti...
Madras High Court
The Divisional Manager vs C.Thimmaraj
Judges:
10 March, 2017·(JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY M.GOVINDARAJ, J.) Challenging the award dated 30.03.2015 passed in M.C.O.P.No.118 of 2014, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special District Court) Krishnagiri, the appellant - insurance company has filed the instant appeal on the grounds of quantum and liabi...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.