M.Arun vs The Tahisldar
Judges:
13 March, 2017·This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 24.08.2016 and seeking a direction to the respondent to issue the legal heirship certificate by conducting proper enquiry as per law by considering the request of the petitioner.2. It is stated that the petitioner's parents marri...
Madras High Court
Vairavanathan vs Dhakshinamoorthy
Judges:
13 March, 2017·There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 06.03.2017, hence the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 13.03.2017. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through the learned counsel on record. Therefore, the Secon...
Madras High Court
M/S.Bhavanji Mills vs The Assistant Commissioner ...
Judges:
13 March, 2017·This Writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent in TIN No.33406040304/2010-11, dated 07.12.2016.2.The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this Writ Petition are as follows:-2(a). The petitioner is carrying on cotton yarn business in the name ...
Madras High Court
The Divisional Manager vs Minor Selvaraj
Judges:
13 March, 2017·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 22.12.2014, passed in M.C.O.P.No.287 of 2011 by the learned Additional District Judge (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Pudukottai.2.The appellant/Insurance Company is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.287 of 201...
Madras High Court
M.Merryston David Scanny vs The Government Of India
Judges:
13 March, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No c...
Madras High Court
The Divisional Manager vs Minor Selvaraj
Judges:
13 March, 2017·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 22.12.2014, passed in M.C.O.P.No.287 of 2011 by the learned Additional District Judge (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Pudukottai.2.The appellant/Insurance Company is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.287 of 201...
Madras High Court
M/S. Oceanic Tropical Fruits ... vs The Assistant ...
Judges:
10 March, 2017·vsi W.P.Nos.503 and 504 of 2016 10.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
R.Shankaranarayanan vs The District Collector
Judges:
10 March, 2017·This writ petition has been filed to quash the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 12.07.2015.2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.3.Mr.V.Vijayaraman, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Veerapandi Police Station, Theni Dis...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director vs Kokila
Judges:
10 March, 2017·(JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.12,42,000/- with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim, till the date of deposit and costs, awarded in M.C.O.P.No.541 of 2012 dated 27.10.2015 on the file of Motor Accide...
Madras High Court
W.P. No.5921 Of 2017 vs The General Manager
Judges:
10 March, 2017·Mr. S. Sairaman, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondent. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to disburse to the petitioner, his s...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.