I Dorai vs The Chairman Chennai Port Trust Rajaji Secretary Secretary To Government Adi Dravidar And Tribal Welfare Department Secretariat Chennai 9 ,The Secretary To Government Adi Dravidar And Tribal Welfare Department Secretariat Chennai 9
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
17 March, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :: 17.03.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARANW.P. No.32674 OF 2014I.Dorai ... petitioner versus1 The Chairman Chennai Port Trust Rajaji Salai Chennai-12 The Secreta...
Madras High Court
A Subramaniam vs The Drugs Inspector And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
17 March, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.03.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Crl.O.P.No.8153 of 2011and M.P.No.1 of 2011A.Subramaniam ..... Petitioner Vs1. The Drugs Inspector, Virudhunagar Range, Virudhunagar Zone, 30/L.P.Shanmugam Zone, Virudhunagar.2. The Assi...
Madras High Court
V Sagadevan And Others vs The Director And Others
Judges: K K Sasidharan, M V Muralidaran
17 March, 2017·K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.The petitioners filed Original Application in O.A.No.846 of 2011 for a declaration that Para 1.2.2 of Merit and Normal Assessment Scheme (for short MANAS) read with Annexure V to the extent it stipulates that the residency period for Drivers for assessment to the next higher grade w...
Madras High Court
W.P. No.6574 Of 2017 vs 3 The Administrator
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Mr. R.K. Gandhi, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondents. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following relief:a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse ...
Madras High Court
P. Madhan vs 3 The Administrator
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Mr. R.K. Gandhi, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondents. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following relief:a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse ...
Madras High Court
A.Kamalakannan vs 3 Air India Air Transport
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Common Prayer:- Writ Appeals have been filed under Section 15 of the Letter Patent Act, against the common order in W.P.Nos.21685 of 2016, 26218 of 2016 and 789 of 2017 dated 17.03.2017 passe dby His Lordship Justice M.M.Sundresh.For Appellant : Mr.V.Prakash, Senior Counsel in all W.As for Mr.K.Suda...
Madras High Court
S.Kannan vs Tmt.Kasiammal
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Alleging that the order dated 18.09.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29431 of 2015 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed. M.M.SUNDRESH, J.mmi2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the order of this Court has...
Madras High Court
K.G. Kamesh vs The Joint Commissioner
Judges:
17 March, 2017·By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The Petitioner would submit that the land in S.No.3333 and its superstructure bearing Door No.19/1, New No.47/1, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004, was leased out to his forefathers, about 90 years back and the above said su...
Madras High Court
W.P. No.2106 Of 2017 vs 3 The Administrator
Judges:
17 March, 2017·Mr. P. Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondents. With consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.2 This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following relief:a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disbu...
Madras High Court
A.Kamalakannan vs 3 Air India Air Transport
Judges:
17 March, 2017·FACTS:3.1.Earlier, there were two separate entities in the name of Indian Airlines and Air India Limited. They were merged into one on 22.08.2007. A Scheme was also framed pursuant to the order passed in W.P.No.17381 of 1991 involving the erstwhile Indian Airlines Limited. As per the said Scheme, 50...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.