Parimala vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
27 June, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent to file final report in Crime No.03 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR was filed in the year 2013 and the petitioner approached the R.MAHADE...
Madras High Court
M Alagappan vs The Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
27 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :27.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.16051 of 2017 M.Alagappan .. Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Mohanur Police Station, Mohanur, Namakkal District. .. Respondent Petitio...
Madras High Court
)Yohannan(Died) vs )P.S.Sounder Raj
Judges:
27 June, 2017·The revision petition is directed against the delivery order passed in E.P.No.21/2003 dated 09.09.2004 pursuant to the final decree passed in the partition suit O.S.No.104/1957 on the file of Kuzhithurai District Munsif Court.2.The plea of the revision petitioner who is the 7th defendant in the suit...
Madras High Court
C.Rajarathi vs D.John Ebenezer
Judges:
27 June, 2017·When the matter was listed on 22.06.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 27.06.2017 under the caption, "for dismissal".Today also, when the matter is taken up for consideration, there is no representation for the petitioner. The continu...
Madras High Court
M/S.New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs T.R.Senthil Raj
Judges:
27 June, 2017·In C.M.A.(MD)No.951 of 2017, the Claimant is the cross objector. The appeal C.M.A.No.951 of 2011 was withdrawn by the Insurance Company. Therfore, the Cross Objection is alone taken up for hearing.2. The Cross Objector sought for compensation of Rs.7,00,000/-(Rupees Seven Lakhs only) for the injurie...
Madras High Court
N.Baby Uma vs Director Of School Education
Judges:
27 June, 2017·(The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Huluvadi G.Ramesh,J) Though there is a delay of 320 days in filing the Writ Appeal, which has been brought to the notice of this Court at the stage of considering and allowing the petition seeking to condone the delay in filing re-presentation on condition...
Madras High Court
S.Juliya vs )The District Elementary ...
Judges:
27 June, 2017·This review application has been filed to review the order dated 23.02.2017 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.1296 of 2017.2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the actual prayer in the writ petition was to quash the order dated 02.11.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent and for a cons...
Madras High Court
L.Saranya vs M.Omprakash
Judges:
27 June, 2017·This petition is filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.87 of 2017 from the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli and transfer to any one of the Family Courts, Chennai.2. The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was conducted on 07.09.201...
Madras High Court
M.Manickam vs R.Santhamani
Judges:
27 June, 2017·The unsuccessful defendant before the Courts below is the appellant herein.2. It is the case of the respondent/plaintiff before the Trial Court that the appellant/defendant entered into a sale agreement dated 02.07.1987 with her in respect of the suit property for a sale consideration of Rs.1,20,000...
Madras High Court
A.Christy Nathiya vs )The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
27 June, 2017·This review application has been filed to review the order dated 23.02.2017 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.17931 of 2016.2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the actual prayer in the writ petition was to quash the order dated 29.07.2016 passed by the 4th respondent and for a con...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.