Madras Fertilizers Dr.Ambedkar ... vs The Secretary To Government
Judges:
29 June, 2017·The Writ Petition has been filed by the Association. Since each member of the said Association has got their own cause of action, the Association cannot represent the members together without disclosing their cause of action. Moreover, in service matters, Association cannot have any locus standi to ...
Madras High Court
M.Devasahayam vs The Inspector General Of Police ...
Judges:
29 June, 2017·The petitioner, who has suffered paralytic attack due to putamen haemorrhage with left sided hemiplegia and as a result, his entire left side of the body got paralysed. Therefore, he was admitted in Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar and remained as in-patient till 28.10.2013. On...
Madras High Court
P.S.Muralikrishna vs Union Of India
Judges:
29 June, 2017·The writ petition is challenging the provisions of SARFAESI Act. The matter is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (2004) 4 SCC 311 (Mardia Chemicals Limited and others Vs. Union of India and others), wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court upheld the provisions of S...
Madras High Court
S Madhavan vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By Its Inspector Of Police Central Crime Branch
Judges: R Mahadevan
29 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.12287 of 2017 and Crl.MP No.8029 of 2017 S.Madhavan, Director M/s.Indigo Business Services (India) Pvt. Ltd ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu represented by i...
Madras High Court
Crl.O.P.(Md)No.8148 Of 2017 vs State Rep. By
Judges:
29 June, 2017·The petitioner is A-5 in C.C.No.131 of 2011 and he has filed the present quash application on the ground that he has arrived at a compromise with the defacto complainant.2. In the considered opinion of this Court, in a trial where more than one accused are there, this Court cannot interfere and quas...
Madras High Court
Union Of India Rep.By vs A.Mathan Raj
Judges:
29 June, 2017·K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.The claim made by the first respondent for compassionate appointment was rejected by the third petitioner by order dated 16/21 September 2015. The said order was put in issue before the Madras Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal.2. The Tribunal, even without giving an opportun...
Madras High Court
M Kamalam vs The District Collector And Others
Judges: M Govindaraj
29 June, 2017·The petitioner is the owner of the land in plot No.11, old survey No.30/1, Patta No.170, measuring an extent of 3185 sq.ft, having purchased the same from Teacher's Co-operative House Building Society Limited, Namakkal, by way of registered sale deed bearing No.109 of 1972, dated 21.12.1971, registe...
Madras High Court
M.Chinna Devar vs The Revenue Divisional Officer
Judges:
29 June, 2017·[Judgment of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Mr.V.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent.2. As the writ appeal is being disposed of at the admission stage itself, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.3. The learn...
Madras High Court
Sugunavathy vs Mr. D.Senthil
Judges:
29 June, 2017·This petition is filed to withdraw and transfer the H.M.O.P 126 of 2016 on the file of Family Court Dindigul to the file of Family Court, Salem.2. The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was conducted on 22.04.2015 as per Hindu rit...
Madras High Court
Suganya vs Kalaiselvan
Judges:
29 June, 2017·This petition is filed to withdraw the petition in H.M.O.P. No.32 of 2017, on the file Addl. Subordinate Judge, Karur and transfer the same to the file of the Sub-Court, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.2. The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The marriage between the petitioner and...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.