S.Jawahar vs M.Babu
Judges:
13 June, 2017·The petitioner filed Execution Petition against the respondent before the Subordinate Court, Uthagamandalam, for attachment of salary at the rate of Rs.8,000/- per month. The learned Subordinate Judge passed an order of attachment, where by and where under, a sum of Rs.3,000/- was directed to be att...
Madras High Court
P Anbumani /Sole vs The State Represented By The Inspector Of Police
Judges: M Nirmal Kumar
13 June, 2017·The above quash petition is filed by the accused in C.C.No.45 of 2011 which is pending trial on the file of District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli for offence under Section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the single accused in this case.2. The respondent received ...
Madras High Court
C.M.A.No.1591 Of 2017 vs Thilagavathy
Judges:
13 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.] Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.47,76,000/- with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim till deposit and costs, awarded to the parents/legal representatives of the deceased, a Homeopathy Doctor, aged about ...
Madras High Court
G Kaliyamoorthi vs I Bhupesh Rajan
Judges: M V Muralidaran
13 June, 2017·When the matter was listed on 09.06.2017 for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was ordered to be listed on 12.06.2017 under the caption “ For Dismissal".M.V.MURALIDARAN,J.ari 2. Even today i.e. 13.06.2017, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is ...
Madras High Court
M.Meenambal vs A.Bama : Plaintiff /
Judges:
13 June, 2017·The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.38 of 1988 on the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai, is the appellant in the above appeal. Since the sole appellant died during the pendency of this appeal, the appellants 1 and 2 are brought on record as the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant.2....
Madras High Court
C.Jayaraman vs Arumbakkam Bala Vinayagar Nagar
Judges:
13 June, 2017·The suit is filed by the respondent/plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining the appellant/defendant from encroaching upon the Temple land. The plaintiff is a registered Association. The plaintiff-Association contended that they have absolute right to maintain and administer the Temple (Arulmi...
Madras High Court
R.Mathivanan vs B.Jahir Ahmed
Judges:
13 June, 2017·The civil revision petition has been filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 05.04.2017 made in I.A.No.147 of 2017 in O.S.No.147 of 2014 on the file of the Sub-Court, Uthangarai (earlier O.S.No.228 of 2010, on the file of the Sub-Court, Krishnagiri).2. The petitioners are the defendants 2 a...
Madras High Court
C.M.A.No.1591 Of 2017 vs Thilagavathy
Judges:
13 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.] Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.47,76,000/- with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim till deposit and costs, awarded to the parents/legal representatives of the deceased, a Homeopathy Doctor, aged about ...
Madras High Court
Suresh Kumar vs Usha
Judges:
13 June, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the fair and final orders dated 24.01.2017 passed in I.A.No.74 of 2015 in O.S.No.174 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge at Namakkal.2. Petitioner is the defendant and respondent is the plaintiff in O.S.No.174 of 2012. Both...
Madras High Court
Lakshmiammal vs S.Natesan
Judges:
13 June, 2017·cgi/jv13. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition No.1681 of 2017 is disposed of. No costs.13.06.2017 index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No speaking order/non speaking order cgi/jv To The District Munsif Rasipuram.C.R.P.(PD)Nos.1213 & 1681 of 2017...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.