S Viswanathan vs The Joint Director
Judges: D Krishnakumar
14 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.6.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.36762 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 S.Viswanathan ... Petitioner Vs.1 The Joint Director, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Department, Kuralagam, II Floor, Chen...
Madras High Court
Kaliappan vs The Superintendent Of Police And Others
Judges: R Mahadevan
14 June, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. He has also R.MAHADEVAN, J.rk made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. In view of the same, liberty is granted and this Cr...
Madras High Court
M/S Annamalayar Aqua Farms [ ] No 55 16 Pillayar Koil Street Padi Kuppam Chennai vs The Designated Officer Food Safety And Drug Administration Department Ddhs Campus Tiruvallure Food Analyst Food Analysis Laboratory King Institute Campus Guindy Chennai Food Safty Officer Ambathur Ii Chennai ,The Food Analyst Food Analysis Laboratory King Institute Campus Guindy Chennai Food Safty Officer Ambathur Ii Chennai ,The Food Safty Officer Ambathur Ii Chennai
Judges: M Duraiswamy
14 June, 2017·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent relating to the impugne...
Madras High Court
A.Arumugam vs The Controller
Judges:
14 June, 2017·Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Despite notice having been served on the respondents and their names have also been printed in the cause list, none appear for them.3. The petitioner's lands have been acquired in Award No.2 of 1985 dated 04.03.1985. As the compensation amount was not ...
Madras High Court
Vanaja vs Mr.S.Gunasekaran
Judges:
14 June, 2017·This Court, while setting aside the impugned proceedings of the respondent/contemnor dated 23.12.2015, vide order dated 27.07.2016, has directed the said official to strictly comply with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 and thereafter t...
Madras High Court
S.Viswanathan vs 3 The Cooperative Election ...
Judges:
14 June, 2017·Challenging the show cause notice issued under section 88 of the Tamilnadu Co-operative Societies Act by the first respondent, dated 3.11.2015, the writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2 The learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the writ petition i...
Madras High Court
M/S.The New India Assurance ... vs Padma
Judges:
14 June, 2017·(JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY M.GOVINDARAJ, J.) Challenging the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Special District Judge) at Krishnagiri, in MCOP No.169 of 2014, dated 02.11.2015, insurance company preferred the appeal.2. The main contention in this appeal is that the acciden...
Madras High Court
R Kanniappan 2 R Gajendran 3 N Arumugam 4 A Punniyamurthy 5 D Thangavel 6 L Karthikeyan 7 K Ponniappan 8 P Achuthan 9 M Arumugam 10P Panchatcharam 11G Anbarasu 12K Nagalingam 13R Balasundaram 14K Boopalan 15K Kanniappan 16A Palani 17N Mani 18A Sukumar 19P Mani 20N Gunasekaran 21K Elumalai 22S Jayapalan 23A Sridhar 24V Sundaravinayagam 25P Mannankatti 26K Vedagiri 27P Kuppan vs 2 1 State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Its Secretary
Judges: D Krishnakumar
14 June, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.6.2017 CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.569 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.406 & 407 of 20161 R.Kanniappan2 R.Gajendran3 N.Arumugam4 A.Punniyamurthy5 D.Thangavel6 L.Karthikeyan7 K.Ponniappan8 P.Achuthan9 M.Arumugam 10P.Panchatcharam 11G...
Madras High Court
S.T.Swamidoss vs The Superintendent Of Police
Judges:
14 June, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] This petitioner is the brother of the detenue, who is aged about 52 years and allegedly detained by the private respondents. To produce her before this Court, this Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed.2.The respondent police have secured and produ...
Madras High Court
Tamil Nadu State Transport ... vs K.Kalavathy
Judges:
14 June, 2017·[Judgment of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.] Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation of Rs.25,69,000/- with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date of claim, till deposit and costs, awarded to the legal representatives of the deceased, appellant/Tamil Nadu State Transpor...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.