S.Thoppilan Kumar vs The Sub-Divisional Executive ...
Judges:
27 July, 2017·The petition has been filed to call for the records and quash the proceedings in Ku.Va.No.100(8701)2016, dated 30.01.2017 of the first respondent, which is only a show cause notice under Section 107 read with 111 Cr.P.C. to the petitioners.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the lea...
Madras High Court
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras ... vs S.Saraswathy
Judges:
27 July, 2017·Impugning the fair and decreetal orders, dated 07.04.2006, passed in I.A.No.276 of 2005 in H.M.O.P.No.8 of 2005, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur, the civil revision petition has been preferred invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. I.A.No.276 of 2005 has been...
Madras High Court
D Vijayalakshmi vs E Vedagiri
Judges: Rajiv Shakdher, Abdul Quddhose
27 July, 2017·(Order of the Judgment was delivered by ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.) This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2013, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in T.O.S.No.8 of 2008 granting probate of the Will dated 10.04.1994 executed by the deceased Kuppammal.2.O.P.No.870 ...
Madras High Court
Santhanaselvan vs State Rep By Its
Judges:
27 July, 2017·This Writ petition is filed for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent to grant permission and accord protection for conducting Minnoli Kabadi Tournament scheduled to be conducted from 09.00 p.m. on 28.07.2017 to 09.00 a.m. on 29.07.2017 and from 09.00 p.m 29.07.2017 to 09.00 a.m. on 30.07....
Madras High Court
R Sakthivel vs The Executive Engineer ( O&M ) Tamil Nadu Generation And Electricity Distribution Corporation Ltd Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Tindivanam
Judges: M Duraiswamy
27 July, 2017·IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.07.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.17050 of 2017 & W.M.P.Nos.18509 & 18510 of 2017 R.Sakthivel ... Petitioner v.1 The Executive Engineer (O&M) Tamil Nadu Generation and Electricity Distribution Corpo...
Madras High Court
The Udumalpet Recreation Club vs The Commissioner
Judges:
27 July, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.,) The petitioner, challenging the impugned lock and seal notice issued by the 1st respondent under Sections 56 & 57 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 has already filed appeal under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Countr...
Madras High Court
S.Thoppilan Kumar vs The Sub-Divisional Executive ...
Judges:
27 July, 2017·The petition has been filed to call for the records and quash the proceedings in Ku.Va.No.100(8701)2016, dated 30.01.2017 of the first respondent, which is only a show cause notice under Section 107 read with 111 Cr.P.C. to the petitioners.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the lea...
Madras High Court
Sr Michaelammal vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu And Others
Judges: M V Muralidaran
27 July, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had died and hence, this petition may be dismissed as abated. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as abated.2707.2017 ub To1. The Government of Tamil Nadu...
Madras High Court
R Muniappan 2 Kottaminti Ramasamy 3 R Narayanan 4 Chettiappan 5 M Veerabhadran Appellants/Defendants vs 1 Mahendran 2 Kamalanathan
Judges: D Krishnakumar
27 July, 2017·Brief facts of the case as follows:The suit property was originally belongs to Malammal by virtue of registered Gift deed, dated 25.8.1953 executed by her mother Gangammal and since then she was in possession and enjoyment of the suit property. Patta was also transferred in her name. The suit prop...
Madras High Court
K.Pasupathy vs The Special District Revenue ...
Judges:
27 July, 2017·The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 21.05.2015 and to take necessary action under the National Highways Act.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner's property in Survey No. 730/6, to an extent of 0....
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.