Ranganayagi vs Vadivel
Judges:
10 January, 2017·This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal had been filed by the 1st respondent in M.C.O.P.No.74 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents 1/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2778 of 2017 Claims Tribunal / Subordinate Court, Rasipuram, questioning the judgment dated 10.01.2017. M.C.O.P.No.74 of 2013...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.13328 Of 2013 vs /
Judges:
10 January, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.HULUVADI G. RAMESH, J.& DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.msr2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismi...
Madras High Court
P. Jayakodi vs The Secretary To Government
Judges:
10 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed praying to quash the letter No.R6/3883/10 dated 19.11.2010 of the third respondent and direct the respondents 1 to 3 to allot house site No.6 in Phase No.III in Namakkal Kondichettypatty to the petitioner as ordered in G.O. 2(E) No. 646 Housing and Urban Development...
Madras High Court
Mr.V.Suresh vs ) The Govt.Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
10 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the 4th respondent passed in O.Mu.No.3116/A3/2016, dated 11.11.2016, vide which, the 4th respondent has returned the proposal of the 5th respondent school, stating that approval for the appointment of the vacant non teaching posts can ...
Madras High Court
S.M.Anthony Muthu vs M.M.Prasad
Judges:
10 January, 2017·When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle as follows:?The petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition?2. The said endorsement is re...
Madras High Court
G.Anjaya Naidu vs V.Venu
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The unsuccessful defendant, who suffered a decree in favour of the plaintiff, is the appellant herein and the appeal has been filed by raising the following substantial questions of law:(i)Whether the respondent proved the easementary right for over 22 years usage of the battai. In the absence of su...
Madras High Court
Kasthuri vs Valarmathi
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The 2nd defendant is the civil revision petitioner before this Court, challenging the order in I.A.No.43 of 2003 in O.S.No.592 of 1996, dated 27.06.2013, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Chengam.2.The respondents/plaintiffs have filed the suit against this petitioner/2nd defendan...
Madras High Court
C.Kathiresan vs The Commissioner For Milk ...
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned revision order in RC No.22771/10/M1 dated 18.06.2011, and consequential review order in RC.No.11335/11 M1 dated 20.08.2011, passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same and c...
Madras High Court
The Branch Manager vs Santha
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The Insurance Company/the second respondent before the Tribunal has come forward with this appeal challenging the alleged involvement of a mini lorry insured with it in the accident that led to the claim before MACT.2. On 12.11.1998 at about 19.00 hours one Mannankatti, aged 49 years, and working as...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.