D.Laxmanan vs The Thasildar
Judges:
10 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to remove all encroachments alleged to have been made in Government Kanmai Porompoke land comprised in R.S.No.23/24, Nethaji Main Road, Bib...
Madras High Court
S.Parthasarathy vs The Registrar Of Trusts/
Judges:
10 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records and quash the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.1807/03 dated 13.03.2003 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to cancel the amendments dated 02.03.1996 to the Trus...
Madras High Court
Minor M.Pravin vs K.Babu
Judges:
10 January, 2017·PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the common fair and decretal order passed in I.A.Nos.14765 and 14766 of 2013 respectively in O.S.No.7202 of 2011 dated 10.12.2013 on the file of the learned XIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.For Petit...
Madras High Court
Lakshmi vs Ilango
Judges:
10 January, 2017·This Review Application has been filed to review the order passed by this Court on 26.04.2006 in the appeal filed by the respondents 1 and 2 against the award of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only), by which, the award of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) was reduced to a sum of Rs.2,40,50...
Madras High Court
R.Janardanan vs Shanthilal M.Jain
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The landlord in the rent control proceedings, who had filed an eviction petition, is the revision petitioner. The revision is directed against the order permitting the first respondent/tenant to mark a copy of the receipt dated 01.02.2002 as an additional documentary evidence.2. The brief facts of t...
Madras High Court
K.Venkateshan vs )The Secretary
Judges:
10 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed, seeking to quash the order of the 3rd respondent passed in Na.Ka.No.559/A2/2015 dated 15.10.2015, vide which, the 3rd respondent has returned the proposal of the 4th respondent school for want of Government order regarding filling up the post. The petitioner has al...
Madras High Court
Mrs. Anu Joy vs The Secretary
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The petitioner calls in question the order dated 26.08.2016 of the fourth respondent whereby the fourth respondent refused to rectify and/or correct the date of birth of the petitioner in the SSLC Mark Sheet from 17.08.1989 to 19.08.1989 and for a consequential direction directing the respondents to...
Madras High Court
K.K.Kathavarayan vs P.N. Amirthavalli
Judges:
10 January, 2017·In view of the representation and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.10.01.2017 cs Copy to The Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam.C.R.P.(PD).No.4022 of 2016 10.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
M.K.Rajendran vs State Transport Authority
Judges:
10 January, 2017·1. Issue notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 1.1. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal.RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.gg2. The limited relief that the petitioner seeks is...
Madras High Court
G.Babulal vs Jeevaraj H. Raj Prohith
Judges:
10 January, 2017·The Criminal Revision Case is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1167 of 2014, dated 10.01.2017 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Madurai, dismissing the petition to condone the delay in filing the appeal against the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.1955 of 2012, dated ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.