Kalidhasan vs The State
Judges:
11 January, 2017·The petitioner seeks a direction to the learned III-Additional District and Sessions Judge (PCR Court), Madurai, to consider the bail application of the petitioner on the day of surrender itself.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side)...
Madras High Court
A.Manju vs Union Of India
Judges:
11 January, 2017·in both Writ Petitions Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the orders dated 1.11.2016 of the 5th respondent Tribunal made in OA Nos. 310/1409 and 310/1410 of 2016 respectiv...
Madras High Court
Gunaselvi vs State Represented By
Judges:
11 January, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) At this stage of hearing of the matter, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has submitted that he is not pressing this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Endorsement is recorded and this Habeas Corpus P...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Chidambaram
Judges:
11 January, 2017·The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 04.07.2011 passed in I.A.No.46 of 2011 in I.A.No.3 of 2011 in O.S.No.2 of 2010 on the file of the Sub-Court, Sathyamangalam.2. The respondents filed the suit in O.S.No.209 of 1988 for partition and the petitioner/defendant filed the pr...
Madras High Court
R.M.Andiappan vs State Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
11 January, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement to the effect that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition. Recording the endorsement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.11.01.2017 vri To1.State of...
Madras High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Appollo Sindhoori Capital
Judges:
11 January, 2017·and Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.ssk.T.C.A.Nos.364 & 365 of 2008 11.01.2017.http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
Murugan vs Santhanam
Judges:
11 January, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition is filed to direct the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin, to expedite the case in A.S.No.96 of 2015 on its file and to dispose of the same on merits, within a specified time frame as may be fixed by this Court.2. The first respondent filed O.S.No.287 of 2011...
Madras High Court
R.Indra vs Royal Sundaram Alliance ...
Judges:
11 January, 2017·Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the endorsement so made, this Ci...
Madras High Court
M/S.Amway India Enterprises Pvt. ... vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
11 January, 2017·1. The captioned Writ Petitions are directed against seven (7) separate orders of even date, i.e., 20.08.2015. The impugned orders pertain to Assessment Years (A.Ys) 2007-2008 to 2013-2014.2. It is pertinent to note that some of the issues dealt with in the impugned orders are common, while others d...
Madras High Court
K.M.Padmini vs Tpsh Aamarnath @ Prabhakar ...
Judges:
11 January, 2017·(Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The learned counsel for the appellant does not press the appeal, but states that the rights of the appellant which she claim may be permitted to be agitated in the civil proceedings C.S.No.434 of 2012. Endorsement has been made.2. ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.