S.Kumar vs V.S.Enterprises
Judges:
12 January, 2017·(Made by Huluvadi G.Ramesh,J) Heard the learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the first respondent and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 2 to 7.2. When the writ appeal came up before this Court, the learned counsel who appeared for the appellants in the wri...
Madras High Court
A.Pavadaisamy vs The District Collector
Judges:
12 January, 2017·The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking to quash the impugned order dated 28.07.2016 passed by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.F(2) 2169/2016 and for a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to issue patta to him in respect of the property at Door No.145, Ku...
Madras High Court
S.Premanand vs Tamilnadu State Marketing ...
Judges:
12 January, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.B.Nedunchezhian, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for TASMAC/respondent.2. The petitioner, while working as a Salesman in Shop No.4124, Kancheepuram North District, was placed under suspension by the respondent, vide impugned or...
Madras High Court
Sivakumar vs State Rep. Through
Judges:
12 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to remove encroachments made by the respondents 4 and 5 in Ward No.43, Ariyamangalam Zone, Tiruchirappalli Municipal Corporation TS ...
Madras High Court
Pramod K.K vs The Inspector General
Judges:
12 January, 2017·By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner joined as a constable in the CISF [Central Industrial Security Force] in the year 2000 and was posted to work at VSA, Port Blair, etc. and due to nature of his job, he subject to transfer to various places. Pe...
Madras High Court
Avudaiappan : vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
12 January, 2017·[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] The petitioner is the detenu - Avudaiappan, S/o.Ramaiah Thevar, aged about 34 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in M.H.S.Confdl.No.94/2016, dated 30.07.2016, holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Sect...
Madras High Court
R.Suresh Kumar vs Muthukannan
Judges:
12 January, 2017·The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.4 of 2009, on the file of the Principal District Court, Thoothukudi, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.18 of 2007, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kovilpatti.2. The defendants are the appellants a...
Madras High Court
G.Manimegalai vs The Director Of Town And
Judges:
12 January, 2017·The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also circulated a letter dated 09.01.2016 to the Registry and also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the letter circulated to the Registry and endorsement made by the learned c...
Madras High Court
R.Elangovan vs P.Palaniappan
Judges:
12 January, 2017·This Contempt Petition has been filed stating that the order of this Court 20.11.2015 passed in M.P.No.1 of 2015 in W.P.No.36991 of 2015 has not been complied with. K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J., smi2. When this contempt petition was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that...
Madras High Court
N.Narayana Reddy vs P.Chinnathambi
Judges:
12 January, 2017·In terms of the directions issued by this Court in W.P.No.17787 of 2015, dated 07.01.2016, the Superintending Engineer, Krishnagiri District, orders have been passed an order on 09.03.2016 and copy of the same has been received by the petitioner on 09.03.2016. T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.vsm2. In the light of...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.