K.Kanagasabai vs R.Sankar
Judges:
12 January, 2017·(delivered by K.K. SASIDHARAN,J.) When this intra court appeal was taken up in the morning session, there was no representation for the appellant and as such, it was passed over. The matter was once again taken up at 11.45 a.m. However, there was no representation. The intra court appeal is dismisse...
Madras High Court
S.K.Chandrakumar vs N.Jayalakshmi
Judges:
12 January, 2017·arr C.M.A. Nos.2863 and 2864 of 2016 12.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
A.Sasirekha vs Tamil Nadu State Transport ...
Judges:
12 January, 2017·Arr/GLN C.M.A. Nos.1737 of 2015 and 108 of 2016 12.01.2017...
Madras High Court
Borgwarner Morse Systems India ... vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Judges:
12 January, 2017·pri W.P.Nos.43927 to 43931 of 2016 And W.M.P.Nos.37753 to 37757 of 2016 12.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
B.Babu vs The Registrar General
Judges:
12 January, 2017·(Made by NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J) Learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition as he was instructed to do so. The petitioner has also filed an affidavit seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. Endorsement was also made by the learned counsel for the ...
Madras High Court
C.L.N.Rao vs Su.Shanmugaa Sundaram
Judges:
12 January, 2017·Though the matter is listed under the caption either for disposal or for dismissal, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner.Therefore, this criminal original petition is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.To1.The Judicial Magist...
Madras High Court
The Executive Engineer (Civil) vs R.Chinnadurai
Judges:
12 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed by the Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board challenging the order dated 18.03.2002 passed by the Labour Court in C.P. No.52 of 1992 under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act.2.For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by the...
Madras High Court
R.Santhoshkumar vs K.N.Selvakumar
Judges:
12 January, 2017·Challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, as inadequate the claimant has come forward with this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.Brief Facts:2. On 27.10.2010, at 2:00 P.M., while the claimant, Santhoshkumar was proceeding in his Hero Honda bearing registration No.TN. 28-A-8266 near ...
Madras High Court
P.Jayakannan vs The Union Of India Owning
Judges:
12 January, 2017·This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in No.Y/SXP.227/PJ/MJR-04/2001, dated 20.12.2002 passed by the 4th respondent and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to reinstate in service with attendant benefits.2. Heard Mr.Veera...
Madras High Court
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Kr.Thannermalai ... Claimant/
Judges:
12 January, 2017·This appeal has been preferred against the award of the Land Acquisition Tribunal, dated 09.12.2009 in L.A.O.P.No.1 of 2003.2.The admitted facts in this case are as follows:2.1.The land measuring an extent of 2.80.0 hectares in Unjani Revenue Village was acquired for providing house sites to Adi Dra...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.