T.Ganesan vs Ms.Sabitha Ias
Judges:
27 February, 2017·It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition, has been complied with. M. SATHYANARAYANAN, J., AP 2 Heard Mr.I.Arockiasamy, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.3 In the light of the said represen...
Madras High Court
G.Gnanamani vs Ms.Sabitha Ias
Judges:
27 February, 2017·It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition, has been complied with. M. SATHYANARAYANAN, J., AP 2 Heard Mr.I.Arockiasamy, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.3 In the light of the said represen...
Madras High Court
M.Krishnakumar vs Rangammal
Judges:
27 February, 2017·The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the fair and decreetal order dated 10.02.2016 in E.P.No.71 of 2005 in O.S.No.282 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Nilgiris at Uthagamandalam.2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.3.The learned counsel appear...
Madras High Court
M/S.Shriram General Insurance vs S.Pankajam
Judges:
27 February, 2017·(Made by S.Manikumar,J) Going through the judgment and decree, we do not find that M/s.Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Chennai, has made out any prima facie case for admission. Added further, Mr.B.Murugavel, learned counsel for the insurance company/appellant, submitted that the entire aw...
Madras High Court
M/S.New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Rathinavel
Judges:
27 February, 2017·The claimant Rathinavel, aged 38 years, an agricultural coolie, earning a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month, met with an accident on 30.12.2012, in respect of which, he made a claim for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- in M.C.O.P.No.1817 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, [Special Sub Judg...
Madras High Court
K. Parasuraman vs 3 Superintending Engineer
Judges:
27 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.P.R.Dhilipkumar, learned Standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2 The petitioner was appointed as a Tester Grade-II, on 17.12.1987 and acquired B.E., degree during November 1994 through Lateral Entry and got his p...
Madras High Court
Jayapaul Samuel vs The Director Of Collegiate ...
Judges:
27 February, 2017·The prayer in the writ petition is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent dated 18.12.2009, in her proceedings Pa.Mu.No.9496-A5-09-1, Pa.Mu.No.9496-A5-09-2 and Pa.Mu.No.9496-A5-09-3 approving the appointment of respondents 4 to 6 as lab technicians by th...
Madras High Court
K.Ramajayam vs The General Manager
Judges:
27 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner joined the services of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation as a Helper on 26.04.2000 [Staff No.JO 8757] and retired from service on 28.02.2015 in the very same capacity and was drawing a salary of Rs.33,499.65 at t...
Madras High Court
G.Vasantha vs Ms.Sabitha Ias
Judges:
27 February, 2017·It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition, has been complied with. M. SATHYANARAYANAN, J., AP 2 Heard Mr.I.Arockiasamy, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.3 In the light of the said represen...
Madras High Court
Corporation Bank vs T.Raja
Judges:
27 February, 2017·kj3.The Director-Administration Bharathiyar College of Engineering and Technology Thiruvettakudy, Karaikal. .. 3rd respondent in all the CRPs. PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. against the fair and decreetal order dated 17.10.2012 in E.P.Nos.89, 93, 94, 95 of 2010 in...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.