K.Subramanian vs Tamil Nadu State Transport
Judges:
21 February, 2017·By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. Mr.K.Venkataramani, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Paramasivadoss, learned Standing counsel for Transport Corporation accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.2. The petitioner joined the service of the respondent ...
Madras High Court
K.L.Indira Gandhi vs A.Balaji
Judges:
21 February, 2017·The respondent-husband filed H.M.O.P.No.62 of 2014 for dissolution of the marriage between the petitioner-wife and himself, before the Principal Sub-Court, Krishnagiri. It is the grievance of the petitioner-wife that since she is now residing with her parents, her parents are not able to monetarily ...
Madras High Court
T.David Manoharan vs 3 Secretary
Judges:
21 February, 2017·Mr.P.Ganesan, learned counsel is present on behalf of the writ petitioner. Mr.S.Gunasekaran, learned Additional Government Pleader is present on behalf of respondents 1 & 2. Mr.R.Prem Narayan, learned counsel is present on behalf of the 3rd respondent.2. By consent of all three counsel, main writ pe...
Madras High Court
Sai Forge Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Judges:
21 February, 2017·1. Learned counsel for the parties have agreed that the issue raised in the captioned writ petition is covered by the judgment of this Court dated 06.02.2017, passed in a batch of Writ Petitions, the lead Writ Petition being : W.P.No.7969 of 2014, titled: M/s.Everest Industries Limited, rep. by its ...
Madras High Court
Prabhu (Minor) vs State Rep. By Inspector Of Police
Judges:
21 February, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate-cum-Juvenile Justice Board, Salem, Salem District to consider the petitioners' bail application on the same day of their surrender in Crime No.552/2016 pending on the file of the respondent police.2...
Madras High Court
Hemalatha vs Prabhakar
Judges:
21 February, 2017·Vs.PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw the petition in H.M.O.P.No.105 of 2016 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Srivilliputtur and transfer the same to the Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi, for having joint trial along with the petition in H.M.O.P.No.1...
Madras High Court
K.Amutha vs Ramesh Sindwani
Judges:
21 February, 2017·The appeal has been preferred against the order dated 05.01.2004 of the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Chennai in W.C.No.287 of 2001.2. The appellants are the claimants. The claimants the heirs of deceased Kali. According to the appellants, Kali was employed as a load man by the first respond...
Madras High Court
W.P.No.4264 Of 2017 vs The Commissioner
Judges:
21 February, 2017·By consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.2. The petitioner was the additional in charge of Arulmigu Rasa Samy Temple, Erode District and he was placed under suspension, vide proceedings of the Joint Commissioner, H.R & C..E. Coimbatore, dated 23.01.2016. Thereafter, a charge memo...
Madras High Court
Sakadevan vs M.Sakkarai
Judges:
21 February, 2017·The plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.147 of 2008 on the file of the First Additional District Judge, Madurai, is the appellant in the above appeal.2.The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.147 of 2008 for passing a preliminary decree in favour of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay the plai...
Madras High Court
Masilamani Gounder vs Narayanasamy
Judges:
21 February, 2017·This Appeal is posted today under the caption for dismissal as there was no representation for the last hearing i.e. 14.02.2017. Even today there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.