Padmasrini vs Minor Sundareswaran
Judges:
04 April, 2017·None appears for the petitioner. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.04.04.2017 Index:Yes/no tar To The Subordinate Judge, Panruti K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.(tar) C.R.P.(P.D.) No.2373 of 2013 04.04.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in...
Madras High Court
R. Sangeetha vs The District Collector Cum ...
Judges:
04 April, 2017·(Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner, who is the wife of the detenu Subramani, aged about 19 years has come up with this habeas corpus petition, challenging the detention order passed against her husband Subramani by the second respondent, vide proceedings No.C3/D.O.No.49...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Mayura Malliah
Judges:
04 April, 2017·The first respondent initiated proceedings against the petitioner in R.C.O.P.No.1764 of 2002 for eviction on the ground of ceased to occupy, subletting and change of user. The petitioner opposed the application by filing counter. The rent controller allowed the application on all the three grounds r...
Madras High Court
P.Seniyappan vs Divya @ Pushpa
Judges:
04 April, 2017·When the matter came up on 28.03.2017, there was no representation on behalf of petitioners and therefore, Registry was directed to post the Criminal Original Petition on 04.04.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no appearance on behalf of petitioners. Hence, this Court is c...
Madras High Court
Sahayamary Jeyarani vs Rethinasami :1St
Judges:
04 April, 2017·This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against the order passed in E.A.No.9 of 2017 in E.A.No.282 of 2011 in E.P.No.40 of 2004 in O.S.No.58 of 1997 dated 04.04.2017 by the District Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.http://www.judis.nic.in 32.E.A.No.9 of 2017 was filed by the first re...
Madras High Court
Prabhoo vs State By Inspector Of Police
Judges: R Mahadevan
04 April, 2017·This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent to file final report in Crime No.1090 of 2012 on the file of the respondent police.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR was filed in the year 2012 and the petitioner approached the R...
Madras High Court
Kuppan @ Kuppusamy vs Mrs.T.Priya
Judges:
04 April, 2017·The learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the order, which is the subject matter of contempt, has been complied with by respondent/condemnor vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.M5/4871/2015 dated 21.02.2017. He has also produced the copy of said proceedings before this Court, w...
Madras High Court
Kumari vs Lakshmi
Judges:
04 April, 2017·This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 27 September 2013 in I.A.No.29 of 2013, whereby and whereunder, the learned III Additional District Munsif, Puducherry, condoned the delay of 430 days in filing the application to set aside the ex parte order.2. Heard the learned couns...
Madras High Court
S. Banumathi vs 2 The Headmaster
Judges:
04 April, 2017·On 15.03.2017 and 03.04.2017, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption for dismissal. Accordingly, today, the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal. Even today, there...
Madras High Court
R.Raghavan vs S.Sethurama Varama
Judges:
04 April, 2017·The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the deemed order of suspension passed against the petitioner has been revoked and he was permitted to join duty. 2 The Court heard the submissions of Mr.I.Arockiasamy, the learned Government Advocate appearing for t...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.