Porchezhian vs State Represented By
Judges:
01 September, 2009·The appellant, who is the accused in Sessions Case No.400 of 2005 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chennai, stands convicted for an offence under Section 376(1) IPC and sentenced to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default, to und...
Madras High Court
Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep vs For
Judges:
01 September, 2009·The Original Application in O.A.765 of 2002 is now the present Writ Petition before this Court.2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.3. The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Supervisor in Indus...
Madras High Court
C.Kandasamy vs N.Chidambaram
Judges:
01 September, 2009·Crl.O.P.No.1436/07 PRAYER CRL.O.P.1436/07 Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the Calender Case in C.C.No.813 of 2006, pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and quash the same.!For Petitioners ....
Madras High Court
Superintending Engineer vs B.Ahamed Kutti
Judges:
01 September, 2009·both the appeals Civil miscellaneous appeals have been filed under Section 39 of the Arbitration and Reconciliation Act, against the order dated 06.11.2001 passed in Arbitration Original Petition Nos.1 of 1998 & 5 of 1997 by the Third Additional Subordinate Court (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Ti...
Madras High Court
Chandira vs Subramanian
Judges:
01 September, 2009·The respondent is decree holder in O.S.No.211 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Kallakurichi. It is a suit for recovery of money filed against this petitioner and the suit was decreed as prayed for. He filed E.P.No.3 of 1999 for attachment of sale of the immovable properties of this petitioner a...
Madras High Court
Arunachalam vs Vijayakumar ... 1St
Judges:
01 September, 2009·The civil revision petition is directed against the fair and decreetal orders, dated 01.09.2009, passed in I.A.No.31 of 2008 in O.S.No.106 of 2005, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti.2. The revision petitioner is the second defendant in O.S.No.106 of 2005. The said suit has been la...
Madras High Court
H.Gururaja Upadya vs No.66
Judges:
01 September, 2009·(Judgment of this Court was delivered by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Challenge is made to an order of dismissal made by the learned Single Judge of this Court in A.No.403 of 2006 in C.S.No.1306/92 whereby the appellant, the tenant of the respondent Wakf Estate, sought for permission to put up a construction...
Madras High Court
Order vs Unknown
Judges:
01 September, 2009·Application No.1903 of 2009 is filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, "the Act") for a direction against the respondent to deliver Schedule-A machinery, including dies and lasts, Sample Developing Machinery, Office Equipment, Information Technology Equipmen...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.