T.Santhappan vs The Director Of Medical And
Judges:
30 September, 2009·Heard both sides.2.This writ petition arose out of O.A.No.3724 of 1998 filed by the petitioner before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal. In view of the abolition of the Tribunal, it was transferred to this court and was renumbered as W.P.No.36342 of 2006.3.The petitioner sought for the issuance...
Madras High Court
Mohammed Gani vs The Sub-Registrar
Judges:
30 September, 2009·This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the appellant against the impugned order, of the third respondent/Inspector General of Registration, Chennai, passed in Mu.Mu.No.18183/No.1/2004 dated 28.04.2004, confirming the order passed by the second respondent/the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ma...
Madras High Court
M.Karuppannan vs Molaiappa Gounder
Judges:
30 September, 2009·This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the Defendants to set aside the order dated 11.7.2008 passed in IA.No.487/2006 in OS.No.842/2005 by the learned Additional District Munsif, Karur.2. The brief facts are as follows:-The Respondent/Plaintiff has filed the above said suit for declaration in resp...
Madras High Court
N.Subburam. ... Revision vs G.K.Sudhagaran
Judges:
30 September, 2009·COMMON ORDER Both the Civil Revision Petitions are filed by the plaintiff to call for the records relating to the orders of notice alone to the respondent passed on 17.9.2009 in I.A.Nos.16545 and 16546 of 2009 respectively in O.S.No.8342 of 2009 on the file of the XVII Assistant Judge, City Civil Co...
Madras High Court
Chelian vs State
Judges:
30 September, 2009·This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 30.11.2004 passed in Sessions Case No.473 of 2003 by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Madurai.2. The three appellants are the husband of the deceased wife, her father in law and mother-in-law and they stand convicte...
Madras High Court
Kasthuri vs Bhaskar
Judges:
30 September, 2009·This Revision has been filed by the petitioners against the order of the lower court passed in I.A.No.14491 of 2007 in O.S.No.7198 of 2005 dated 16.10.2008.2. The petitioners herein are the defendants before the lower court. The respondent is the plaintiff.3. The respondent/plaintiff had filed the a...
Madras High Court
S.Ambalam vs The Divisional Development ...
Judges:
30 September, 2009·Heard both sides.2.This writ petition arose out of O.A.No.2400 of 1998 filed by the petitioner before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal. In view of the abolition of the Tribunal, it was transferred to this court and was renumbered as W.P.No.35896 of 2006.3.The petitioner sought for the issuance...
Madras High Court
Sri Krithika Finance vs R. Elangovan
Judges:
30 September, 2009·The petitioner is decree holder. He filed the suit in O.S.No.386 of 1991 on the file of the Sub-Court, Sankari against the defendants for recovery of money on 5.3.1991. The said Court passed decree in favour of this petitioner. Afterwards Sankari Sub-Court was bifurcated and a part of territorial ju...
Madras High Court
Alagarsamy vs Krishnan
Judges:
30 September, 2009·This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the plaintiffs against the order dated 22.2.2007 passed in IA.No.210/2000 in OS.No.12/2005 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam.2. The petitioners have filed the above said suit against the respondents 2 and 3 for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,70,000/-...
Madras High Court
R.Praksh Kumar vs The Secretary To Govt
Judges:
30 September, 2009·Heard both sides.2. This writ petition arises out of O.A.No.2697 of 1998 filed before the Tamilnadu Administrative Tribunal. The five petitioners who were employed in the Boat House under the control of the fourth respondent sought for a direction to regularise their services in the post of Bill Cle...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.