J.Josephine Christobell vs P.Subramanian
Judges:
08 September, 2009·The landlord is the revision petitioner herein. This Civil Revision Petition has arisen out of the proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (herein after referred to as the Act) for eviction of the respondent/tenant from the property belonging to the petitioner/landlor...
Madras High Court
L.Jeyam vs The Superintending Engineer
Judges:
08 September, 2009·The Writ Petitions have been filed to quash the demand issued by the second respondent dated 15.07.2009 and 16.07.2009 by which the second respondent has changed the electricity tariff from demand III A(2) to that of III A(1) demanded for short fall assessment with effect from September 2007 to May ...
Madras High Court
Raghavan. ... Revision vs E.Viswanathan
Judges:
08 September, 2009·The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the plaintiff challenging the order and decreetal order dated 16.12.2008 passed in I.A.No.184 of 2008 in O.S.No.325 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ponneri.2. The suit has been filed for declaration and for recovery of vacant possession of th...
Madras High Court
S.Alagarswamy vs The Deputy Superintendent Of ...
Judges:
08 September, 2009·Heard Mr.K.Venkatramani, Senior Counsel for petitioner and Tmt.C.K.Vishnupriya, Additional Government Pleader for respondent in this O.A.2.In this O.A.1013 of 2002 (W.P.8366 of 2007), the order dated 29.09.2000 of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Srivaigundam, Tuticorin District, the second ...
Madras High Court
In The High Court Of Judicature At ... vs Dhiren Krishna Paul
Judges:
08 September, 2009·Heard both sides.2.In this matter, originally, arguments were heard and orders were reserved on 17.06.2009. However, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants mentioned that there was a possibility of settlement and hence may be posted before the court. Accordingly, the matter came to be posted...
Madras High Court
A.Pachaiappa Gounder vs The Special Commissioner & ...
Judges:
08 September, 2009·Heard Mr.N.Manokaran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents.2. As against the order of the second respondent dated 20.6.1995 passed in O.A.No.27 of 1993 which was under Section 64 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Chari...
Madras High Court
Minor Pradeesh Kumar vs The Station House Officer
Judges:
08 September, 2009·This petition is filed, seeking for a direction to the Juvenile Board to consider and pass orders on the same day of the production of the petitioners by their close relatives under section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, on considering the affidavit undertaking of the guardian and without waiting f...
Madras High Court
The Managing Director & vs Additional Secretary
Judges:
08 September, 2009·The writ petitions were preferred by the contesting respondents for direction on the appellant, ICICI Bank (hereinafter referred to as the 'Bank') to pay pension according to the Pension Scheme in view of Rule 2 (ze), 2 (zea), 35 (i) and 35 (ii) of the Bank of Madura Employees Pension Regulations, 1...
Madras High Court
S.Thangaraj vs The District Collector-Cum-
Judges:
08 September, 2009·The case of the petitioner is as follows:The writ petitioner is the Vice President of Gundakal Village Panchayat, Zodukuli Post, Omalur Taluk. He is aggrieved by the order of the first respondent dated 17.02.2009, by which, the District Collector-cum-Inspector of Village Panchayats, Salem District o...
Madras High Court
S. Sheikh Akbar vs The Inspector Of Village ...
Judges:
08 September, 2009·Challenging the order of the first respondent dated 12.11.2008, an order of the Inspector of Panchayat, Villupuram, removing the petitioner from the post of the president of Murarpalayam village panchayat and the confirmation of the same, by the Government of Tamil Nadu, the present writ petition wa...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.