M.John Vincent vs The Inspector General Of Police
Judges:
19 October, 2009·This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records of the first respondent in No.T.IX.42/07-ADM.I dated 28.12.2007 and quash the same and direct the respondents to retain the petitioner in service at the office of the second respondent.2. The writ pet...
Madras High Court
C.Radhakrishnan vs M/S. Digivision Ltd
Judges:
19 October, 2009·This first appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27 November, 1997 in O.S.No.9557 of 1996 on the file of the V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai directing the appellants and respondents 2 & 3 to pay a sum of Rs.1,93,577.62 with interest at 12% per annum to the first resp...
Madras High Court
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control ... vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control ...
Judges:
19 October, 2009·The petitioners are similarly placed and have common grievance arising out of the same cause of action. Hence, they have filed this writ petition challenging the proceedings No.76 dated 17.11.1999 of the 1st respondent and the order of the 2nd respondent bearing Lr.No.Per/P2/1283/99 dated 27.04.2000...
Madras High Court
J.Kuppuswamy vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Judges:
19 October, 2009·The orders of the respondents in (Permanent) B.P.(CH) No.212, dated 23.08.1999 and the consequential order passed in Memorandum No.79295/A5/A51/99-1, dated 10.12.1999, are under challenge in this Writ Petition.2. Petitioner, a B.E.Graduate of 1963 Batch of Madras University, joined T.N.E.B.as Assist...
Madras High Court
Md. Abbas Mohideen vs Vijay Singh
Judges:
19 October, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN, J.) This is an application taken out under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, by innocuously couching the prayer as follows :"....to issue notice to the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Honourable Court ...
Madras High Court
A.Annamalai vs The Deputy Registrar
Judges:
19 October, 2009·Challenge in this Writ Petition is with regard to the jurisdiction of the respondent to suspend the petitioner from service.2. Short facts leading to the Writ Petition are as follows:The petitioner is a Co-operative Sub Registrar (Public Distribution System), Nangavalli Block, Salem District under t...
Madras High Court
Rajagopal vs Anjali
Judges:
19 October, 2009·The Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgement and decree dated 21.3.2000 made in A.S.No.3 of 2000 on the file of Principal District Judge, Chengalpet confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.8.99 made in O.S.No.172 of 1988 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalput.2. The a...
Madras High Court
Manickam vs Rahmath Beevi
Judges:
19 October, 2009·The petitioners/respondents/judgment debtors have filed this civil revision petition as against the order dated 28.08.2003 passed in E.A.No.246 of 2003 in E.P.No.87 of 2003 in O.S. No.401 of 1981 by the Learned District Munsif Tiruvarur.2. The trial Court, while passing orders in E.A.No.246 of 2003 ...
Madras High Court
R.Murugan vs The Director Of Public Health
Judges:
15 October, 2009·Svki W.P.Nos.35153,33760,34988, 34977,34983,33648,34381 to 34385 of 2006 (O.A.Nos.7915,9036,9037,9038, 9039,10313,10021 to 10025/1998) 15.10.2009...
Madras High Court
M.Mahendran vs The District Forest Officer
Judges:
15 October, 2009·The Original Application in O.A.No.1793 of 2002 before the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") is now Writ Petition in W.P.No.8357 of 2007 before this Court.2.The petitioner was initially appointed as Office Watchman with effect from 08.05.1998 in Hosur For...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.