D.Kalpana Devi vs K.Chandra
Judges:
04 November, 2009·The defendant who suffered a decree for ejectment before both the Courts below prefers the second appeal.2.The plaintiff has alleged that the defendant who is a tenant under him on a monthly rent of Rs.1200/- failed to pay the rent and has not vacated the premises as directed in the notice issued by...
Madras High Court
Sampath vs Krishnamoorthy
Judges:
04 November, 2009·The revision petitioner/petitioner/defendant has filed this civil revision petition as against the order in E.A.No. --/2004 in O.E.P.No.78 of 2004 in Arni Sub Court O.S.No.98 of 2002 dated 20.12.2004 passed by the Learned District Munsif Polur, Tituvannamalai, in rejecting the stay application filed...
Madras High Court
Maanvizhi (A) Mana Vijie vs Venkatachalam (A) Vingudasalam
Judges:
04 November, 2009·Appeal filed under Section 96 C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge of Pondicherry, dated 15.10.1998 made in O.S.No.342 of 1995.For appellant : Mr.R.Subramanian For respondents : Mr.R.Subramanian, Senior Counsel for Ms. S.Hemalatha.-----(JUDGMENT OF THE C...
Madras High Court
V.Baladhandayutham vs Ind Bank Merchant Banking Service ...
Judges:
04 November, 2009·Ind Bank Merchant Banking Service Limited, rep. By its Vice President, R.Ravi, III Floor, Raja Annamalai Building, 19, Marshalls Road, Chennai-8. ...Respondent in Crl.O.P.21221/02] Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the entire records relating to the proceedings ...
Madras High Court
Thiagarajan(Died) vs D.Meenakshi
Judges:
04 November, 2009·The defendants who suffered a decree for permanent injunction at the hands o the plaintiff throughout prefers the present second appeal.2.The plaintiff would contend that he got the suit properties under the oral partition that took place in his family on 08.07.1960. He has been in the possession an...
Madras High Court
The Tamil Nadu All Constitution vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
04 November, 2009·The petitioner is a Trade Union challenging the order of the first respondent - State Government GO.MS(STD)No.124 Labour and Employment Department, dated 24.10.2008 as illegal, unconstitutional and ultravires.2. It is the case of the Petitioner Union that they represent the construction workers in T...
Madras High Court
K.Jayakumar vs The Registrar Of Co-Operative ...
Judges:
04 November, 2009·The order of the second respondent in proceedings Na.Ka.No.11878/01/Pa.tho dated 27.12.2006 has been called in question and seeking to quash the same, the present writ petition is filed.2. (a) The petitioner is working as Junior Assistant in the Office of the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Society...
Madras High Court
K.Sivakami vs The Secretary To Government
Judges:
04 November, 2009·The writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent dated 13.10.2009 under which the first respondent, relying upon the letter of the second respondent dated 11.9.2009, has rejected the claim of the petitioners made under Section 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act (for brevity, "th...
Madras High Court
M.S.Muhammed Sheik Abdullah vs The Secretary To Government Of ...
Judges:
04 November, 2009·This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to take necessary action against the respondents 4 and 5 and to direct them to pay compensation of Rs.50,00,000/- and to refund the fees of Rs.7,50,000/- paid by the petitioner to the fifth respondent college.2/13 ht...
Madras High Court
S. Shanmughasundaram vs Indian Overseas Bank
Judges:
04 November, 2009·The defendant has preferred the appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.2.1999 made in O.S.No. 531 of 1995 on the file of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode.2. The respondent herein filed the suit seeking for a Decree directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff Bank a ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.