Prakash @ Sivaprakash vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
29 June, 2009·Challenging and impugning the judgement dated 27.11.2006 passed by the Additional District and Sessions (Fast Track Court-II), Coimbatore in C.A.No.366 of 2006 confirming the judgement dated 9.8.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate-II, Pollachi, in C.C.No.61 of 2001, this revision case is focussed...
Madras High Court
K.V.Kunhameed Koya vs A.G.L.Irudhayaraj
Judges:
29 June, 2009·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the defendants against the order passed in I.A.No.800 of 2005 in O.S.No.1881 of 2004 where an application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking appointment of Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit properties.2. Being aggrieved by...
Madras High Court
M/S.Anand Agross Limited By Its ... vs M/S.Tvs Finance & Services ...
Judges:
29 June, 2009·The Petitioners are arrayed as accused 1 to 7 in CC.No.10817/2006 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai-1.2. The Petitioners seek to quash the proceedings in CC.No.10817/2006 on the grounds that the promissory note dated 27.3.2000 and the hire purchase agreement dated ...
Madras High Court
Ravichandran vs Vanmathi
Judges:
29 June, 2009·Challenging and impugning the order dated 16.11.2005 passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Cuddalore at Chidambaram, in C.R.P.No.76 of 2004, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A 'resume' of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this c...
Madras High Court
N.Gopalan vs K.Udhayakumar
Judges:
29 June, 2009·The second accused in C.C.No.493/2008 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Erode has come forward with the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing the said criminal proceedings so far as the petitioner is concerned.2. The above said case, namely C.C.No.493/2008 was insti...
Madras High Court
Premavathi vs Sundararajan
Judges:
29 June, 2009·K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN, J.O.P. No.226 of 1985 filed for issuance of letters of administration of the Will of the testatrix - Kakkammal has been converted into Testamentary Original Suit and numbered as TOS No.11 of 1987, as the husband of the testatrix questioned the genuineness, execution and attestati...
Madras High Court
T.Subramani vs The Joint Director Of School
Judges:
29 June, 2009·By order dated 23.10.1998, the request of the petitioner to revise the seniority in the post of Tamil Pandit, has been rejected by the Joint Director of School Education, the first respondent. The said order is under challenge.2. Though the petitioner has challenged the revision of seniority and con...
Madras High Court
T.Sekar vs Thiru M.Ravi
Judges:
29 June, 2009·(ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY B. RAJENDRAN, J.) This contempt petition arises out of violation of the order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Gudiyattam in I.A.No.1 of 2009 in O.S.No.4 of 2009, dated 05.1.2009 in respect of seizure of a vehicle.2. By the said order, Mr.V.Ranjith Kumar was a...
Madras High Court
Ramaiyan vs Ramamirtham
Judges:
29 June, 2009·The Second Appeal has been filed by the defendants 1, 3 to 6/ appellants against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.06.2009 in A.S.No.130 of 2008, on the file of the learned Additional Sub Judge, Kumbakonam.2. The respondent herein has filed a suit in O.S.No.91 of 2001 on the file of the learned Distr...
Madras High Court
R.Muthukrishnan vs The Registrar
Judges:
29 June, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by ELIPE DHARMA RAO,J.) The petitioners have filed these writ petitions praying for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the common order made in O.A.Nos. 4104 of 1992, 5834 of 1994, 9574 of 1997, 74 of 1999, 4284 of 1999, 6...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.