Ram Theatre vs The Deputy Commissioner
Judges:
17 June, 2009·Common Order (Made by B.RAJENDRAN,J.) These are the writ appeals filed against the common order dated 23.06.2000 passed in Writ Petition Nos.13468 and 13469 of 1993.2. The appellant filed writ petitions praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file...
Madras High Court
M.Subramanian vs C.R.Thangavel
Judges:
17 June, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 27.9.2005, passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.II-cum-Special Magistrate, Attur, in Crl.M.P.No.6067 of 2005 in C.C.No.125 of 2002., this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and g...
Madras High Court
The District Collector vs Sarangapani
Judges:
17 June, 2009·The above Second Appeal arises against the judgment and decree dated 18.08.1997 made in A.S.No.74 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Panruti, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 22.12.1994 made in O.S.No.3 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti.2. In the above seco...
Madras High Court
Dayalan vs Jayanthi
Judges:
17 June, 2009·Animadverting upon the the common order dated 20.7.2006, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpagttu, in M.C.No.5 of 2005 this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A 'resume' of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision case would run th...
Madras High Court
Mani @ Chinnasamy vs A.Banumathy
Judges:
17 June, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 15.06.2006, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode in M.C.No.36 of 2005, this criminal revision is focussed.2. Broadly but briefly, narratively but precisely, the case of the respondent/wife herein is to the effect that the respondent and the petiti...
Madras High Court
Subban @ Subramani vs Kaliyammal
Judges:
17 June, 2009·Challenging and impugning the order dated 13.6.2006, passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Palacode, in M.C.No.10 of 2001, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A summation and summarisation of the relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of t...
Madras High Court
Dhanapackiam vs State By Inspector Of Police
Judges:
17 June, 2009·Animadverting upon the the judgement dated 8.11.2005, passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Mettur Dam, in C.C.No.55 of 2003, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A 'resume' of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision case would run thus:-T...
Madras High Court
B.Govindaswamy vs Inspector General Of Police
Judges:
17 June, 2009·The main points raised in this Writ Petition are, "(a) Whether the Disciplinary Authority has to issue a show cause notice, before inflicting a major penalty of removal, dismissal, compulsory retirement or reduction in rank, when he takes into consideration the previous penalties suffered by a delin...
Madras High Court
Tn.Post Graduate Teachers vs The Secretary To The Government
Judges:
17 June, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the first respondent, dated 18.10.2000, in so far as it relates to the recovery of the incen...
Madras High Court
M/S. Parvathi Cashew Industries vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
17 June, 2009·(Made by F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA,J.) This tax case revision has been preferred by the assessee, which pertains to the assessment year 1990-91 under the TNGST Act. The assessee is stated to have purchased cashew nuts from one M/s.Century Cashew Products. The Assessing Authority held that the said purc...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.