Krishnaraj(A1) vs State Represented By
Judges:
28 July, 2009·Crl.A.No.671 of 2008 State represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nellikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District. .. Appellant in C.A.671/2008 Vs.This judgment shall govern the four criminal appeals viz., Crl.A.No.531/2008 filed by A1, Crl.A.No.671/2008 filed by the State, Crl.A.No.567/2008...
Madras High Court
Piliadayal vs Durai Pandi
Judges:
28 July, 2009·Challenging the fair and decreetal order dated 29.11.2008 passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Natham in I.A.No.117 of 2008 in O.S.No.34 of 2006, this revision has been filed.2.The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant. The petitioner/ plaintiff has filed ...
Madras High Court
Sheik Meera Sahib & Sons vs T.K. Ramakrishnan
Judges:
27 July, 2009·[in both CRP.PDs.] Civil Revision Petition No.27 of 2009 filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the docket order in M.P.No.814 of 2008 in R.C.A.No.315 of 2005, dated 12.12.2008 passed by VIII Small Causes Court, Chennai.Civil Revision Petition No.28 of 2009 filed under <act id...
Madras High Court
G.Irusappan vs Santhakumari
Judges:
27 July, 2009·Animadverting upon the judgment dated 28.3.2007, passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge at Pondicherry in Crl.A.No.30 of 2003, confirming the judgment dated 21.7.2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Pondicherry in STR No.5778 of 2000, this criminal revision is focussed.2. Tersely...
Madras High Court
Samsunisha Beevi vs Khadher Mohideen
Judges:
27 July, 2009·Challenging the judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin in I.A.No.497 of 2006 in O.S.No.143 of 2004, the Civil Revision Petition has been filed.2.The petitioner is the 2nd defendant and the respondents are the plaintiffs. Originally the suit was filed before the Principal District Munsi...
Madras High Court
Sankaranarayanan vs Kanaga
Judges:
27 July, 2009·The civil revision petitions are directed against the fair and decreetal orders, dated 27.07.2009, passed in I.A.Nos.232, 234, 235 and 233 of 2008 respectively in A.S.No.58 of 2002, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli,.2. The revision petitioners are the defendants in O.S.No....
Madras High Court
S.K.Chinnasamy vs The Director Of School Education
Judges:
27 July, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondents to re-fix the petitioners pay as Rs.890/-, with effect from 31.12.1982.3. The petitioner has stated...
Madras High Court
Dr.Mushtaq Ali vs National Council For Teacher ...
Judges:
27 July, 2009·This petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to grant recognition for the B.Ed., course of Muna College of Education run by Dr.Rahman's trust, as sought for, vide application, dated 27.08.2008.2.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had su...
Madras High Court
N.Thiagarajan vs The Regional Joint Director
Judges:
27 July, 2009·V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.The Secretary of Saraswathi Narayanan College, Madurai, who is the appellant in the Writ Appeal and the petitioner in the Writ Petition, filed W.P.(MD)No.3002 of 2008 to quash an order in G.O.Ms.No.86, Higher Education (D2) Department, dated 20.3.2008, suspending the Management...
Madras High Court
Mr.Sekar Reddy vs Jayarama Reddy
Judges:
27 July, 2009·This civil revision petition has been projected by the revision petitioners/petitioners/defendants as against the order dated 05.12.2006 in I.A.No.1229 of 2004 in O.S.No.58 of 1987 passed by the learned District Munsif, Ponneri in rejecting the application filed for condonation of delay of 357 days ...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.