Pavayammal vs S.N. Chockalingam
Judges:
28 July, 2009·The revision petitioners/petitioners/defendants have filed this civil revision petition as against the order dated 4.9.2007 in I.A. No. 222 of 2006 in unnumbered A.S. passed by the learned first Additional District Judge, Erode in dismissing the application filed by the revision petitioners under Or...
Madras High Court
The Application Is Filed Under ... vs Union Of India And Another [Air ...
Judges:
28 July, 2009·The application is filed under section 8(1)(b) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, for appointment of a retired Supreme Court Judge or High Court Judge in the place of late Mr.Justice K.Venkatasamy, as per arbitration agreements dated 19.2.1991 and 18.6.1991, to resolve the dispute between the applicant a...
Madras High Court
M.Manickam Chettiar vs L.Vincent
Judges:
28 July, 2009·This is a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of money from the defendant.2. Broadly but briefly, narratively but precisely, the case of the plaintiff as stood exposited from the plaint could be portrayed and parodied thus:The defendant borrowed from the plaintiff a sum of Rs.5 lakhs, Rs.2 lakh...
Madras High Court
Mandhri Gounder vs Durai Gounder (Died)
Judges:
28 July, 2009·The plaintiff is the revision petitioner in the above Civil Revision Petition which has been filed challenging the order dated 28.07.2009 of the District Munsif, Polur, in I.A.No.321 of 2009 in O.S.No.164 of 1999 in and by which the learned Judge has dismissed the application filed by the revision p...
Madras High Court
Gurusamy vs Rajeswari
Judges:
28 July, 2009·Challenging and impugning the order dated 20.12.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Karaikal, in M.C.No.17 of 2004, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. Compendiously and consciously, the facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision case would run ...
Madras High Court
Ibram Sha vs M/S.Lakshmi Prabha Chit Funds (P) ...
Judges:
28 July, 2009·The revision petitioner/respondent/Judgment Debtor has filed the civil revision petition as against the order dated 24.06.2008 in R.E.P.No.542 of 2007 in A.O.P.No.109 of 2006 ordering arrest of the revision petitioner by 15.07.2008 in the application taken out by the respondent/decree holder under O...
Madras High Court
R.Edwin David vs K.Leela
Judges:
28 July, 2009·1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the order dated, 4.2.2014, made in IA.No.683 of 2012 in OS.No.205 of 2006, by the II Additional Sub Judge, Madurai.2. The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the Defendants 6 and 7 are the Petitioners and the Plaintiff is the Respon...
Madras High Court
V.Sadasivan Nair vs Raghavan Nair
Judges:
28 July, 2009·This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.101 of 1999, dated 04.06.2003, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.932 of 1994, dated 17.09.1999,on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Padman...
Madras High Court
Minor E.B.Sunandha vs The Dean (Agriculture)
Judges:
28 July, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. By consent of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.3. The father of the petitioner has filed the affidavit in support of the writ petition stating that ...
Madras High Court
Balu vs Jayaganthan
Judges:
28 July, 2009·Challenging and impugning the judgement dated 5.1.2007 passed by the Additional District Sessions Judge, IV Fast Track Court, Poonamallee, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. Compendiously and consciously, the facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision c...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.