The Branch Manager vs Kalaiselvi
Judges:
03 July, 2009·in both appeals Vs1.Kalaiselvi2.Minor Raja3.Minor Mariammal (Minors rep. through Guardian 1st Respondent Kalaiselvi)4.K.Palanivel5.P.Anjammal .. Respondents 1 to 5/Petitioners in C.M.A.No.1773 of 20086.R.Raja .. 6th Respondent/1st Respondent in C.M.A.No.1773 of 2008 (6th respondent Ex-parte before t...
Madras High Court
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Mohanraj
Judges:
03 July, 2009·This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.207 of 2004, challenging the order passed in I.A.No.46 of 2009 filed for seeking to stay the further proceedings.2. The petitioner herein is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.No.207 of 2004, on the file of the Motor Ac...
Madras High Court
J.Hussain Farid vs The Deputy General Manager (Bsnl)
Judges:
03 July, 2009·The petitioner is a Contractor approved by the BSNL and he has undertaken several Trenching and Pile laying of Optical Fiber Cable from the respondents and has completed the works successfully in the past. The first respondent issued a tender schedule for trenching, PLB Pipe laying and allied works ...
Madras High Court
R. Subbulakshmi vs M/S. Sri Ramakrishna Traders
Judges:
03 July, 2009·The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent/complainant has filed the case in STC.No.2785 of 2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tiruppur on an alleged offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner's counsel further submits that ...
Madras High Court
K.Krishnakumar @ Kumar vs Sasikala @Kala.K
Judges:
03 July, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 14.7.2006 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court Chennai, in M.C.No.444 of 2003, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. Compendiously and precisely, the facts which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision case would ...
Madras High Court
B.Vanila vs R.Iyyasamy
Judges:
03 July, 2009·The fourth defendant in O.S.No.147 of 2005, a suit laid for partition of the suit property, has preferred this appeal. For the sake of convenience, parties would be referred to by their rank before the trial Court.2.The plaint allegations are :● There are two items of properties scheduled to in the ...
Madras High Court
M.Muniyandi vs The Special Commissioner And
Judges:
03 July, 2009·The Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allot the land comprised in S.No.237/1 and 101 Agaramthen Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District in favour of the petitioner.2. The brief facts for disposal of the case is as follows:- The writ petiti...
Madras High Court
L.Selva vs Asokan
Judges:
03 July, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 9.10.2006 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Vellore, in C.A.No.24 of 2006, modifying the order dated 8.2.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate IV, Vellore, in C.C.No.263 of 2005, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A 'resume of facts, which are absolu...
Madras High Court
Kaliannan vs Rajini Jeyan
Judges:
03 July, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 13.11.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Namakkal, in C.C.No.145 of 2006., this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A 'resume of facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision case would run thus:The revisi...
Madras High Court
Sathya Vijay School Of Nursing vs State Government Of Tamil Nadu
Judges:
03 July, 2009·Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the pet...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.