S.Ravi vs The Tamil Nadu Advocate'S Clerks
Judges:
13 July, 2009·Heard both sides.2.Following the foot steps of the associations of Advocates in litigating the elections to their associations before the Courts, it is the turn of the Advocate Clerks to come up with such pleas and that too for the second time. Seeing the array of counsels appearing in this case wil...
Madras High Court
New India Assurance Co.Ltd vs Petchiammal
Judges:
13 July, 2009·The appeal has been preferred by the insurance company against the award of Rs.4,41,000/- for the death of one Miss.Amudha, who died in an accident occurred on 25.04.2003.2. The case of the respondents 1 and 2/claimants is that their daughter Miss.Amudhua was a student in a College went for an educa...
Madras High Court
M/S.New India Assurance vs Sujatha
Judges:
13 July, 2009·In the claim petition it is stated that on 3.12.1998 at about 00.30 hours while one Sivaperumal was riding his Yamaha two wheeler bearing Registration No.TN-23-B-9403 towards Vellore, it was skid, he fell down and he died on the spot. A case was registered in Cr.No.469 of 1998 under Section 279, 338...
Madras High Court
Tamilnadu State Transport vs Tmt. Sivakumari
Judges:
13 July, 2009·It is stated in the claim petition that one Govindaraj was working as a conductor in the respondent transport corporation in Omalur Branch. First claimant is his wife, 2nd and 3rd claimants are his children and 4th claimant is his mother. On 27.09.2000 at 6.00 p.m. while he was proceeding towards Om...
Madras High Court
Coram vs Union Of India
Judges:
13 July, 2009·With the grievance that the promotion policy of the second respondent Bank (vide circular PAD/47/98-99 dated 16.12.1998) follows the principle "merit-cum-seniority", instead of "seniority-cum-merit" in the matter of promotion of officers, the petitioner-Union is before this Court with this writ peti...
Madras High Court
Venkatesan @ Venkatachalam vs State Rep. By
Judges:
13 July, 2009·Animadverting upon the judgment dated 19.01.2007 made in C.A.No.222 of 2006 on the file of the learned Addl. District cum Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Coimbatore, confirming the judgment dated 09.05.2006 made in C.C.No.460 of 2002 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Pollac...
Madras High Court
G.V.Films Limited vs Indian Bank
Judges:
13 July, 2009·Heard both sides.2.The applicant M/s.G.V.Films Limited is also the plaintiff in both the suits. While C.S.No.48 of 2008 has been instituted for redemption of the mortgage, C.S.No.49 of 2008 has been instituted for a declaration that the provisions of the SARFAESI Act do not apply to the security int...
Madras High Court
Jogappa vs The State
Judges:
13 July, 2009·Challenging and impugning the order dated 12.4.2006 passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, in C.C.No.50 of 2004, this criminal revision case is focussed.2. A 'resume' of facts, absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this criminal revision case would run t...
Madras High Court
Veeran vs Erode Town
Judges:
13 July, 2009·Complainant in both appeals Criminal appeals preferred under Sec.374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of the Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court No.I, Erode, in S.C.No.28/2008 dated 12.5.2008.For Appellants : Mr.A.K.Kumaraswamy in CA 392/2008 Mr.S.K.R...
Madras High Court
Dr.A.C.Muthiah vs The Board Of Control For
Judges:
13 July, 2009·When this matter was taken up for arguments before this Court, this Court informed both parties that for the IPL league matches, complementary tickets were given to the Judges of this court and this court, being recipient of one such complementary ticket (though never utilized it), was it proper for...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.