Mrs.Fatima Fausia vs Rajesh Malhotra
Judges:
17 July, 2009·The revision is directed against the judgment of conviction recorded by the learned VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai in the proceedings initiated under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as against the petitioner herein and confirmed by the learned Additional District and...
Madras High Court
P.Durairaj vs P.Madanlal Jain
Judges:
17 July, 2009·The accused in C.C No.65 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyattam has come forward with the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the above said criminal proceedings instituted against him.2.The submissions made by Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, learned counsel for the...
Madras High Court
R.Ranganathan vs The Special Commissioner &
Judges:
17 July, 2009·The Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of Repeal Act 20 of 1999 under Sections 3 and 4 of the said Act and entitled to hold the property as a free hold property free from Urban Land Ceiling Regulation Act, 1978 and...
Madras High Court
G.Kothandan vs The Special Commissioner &
Judges:
17 July, 2009·The Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of Repeal Act 20 of 1999 under Sections 3 and 4 of the said Act and entitled to hold the property as a free hold property free from Urban Land Ceiling Regulation Act, 1978 and...
Madras High Court
Muthukrishnan @ Anbazhagan vs State Rep. By
Judges:
17 July, 2009·Animadverting upon the order dated 28.06.2006 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Pondicherry in C.A.No.54 of 2004 confirming the conviction and modifying the sentence passed in C.C.No.179 of 2001 dated 09.07.2004 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Pondicherry, this cri...
Madras High Court
Danfoss Industries Pvt.Ltd vs The District Collector
Judges:
17 July, 2009·The case of the petitioner is as follows:-The petitioner had purchased lands measuring a total extent of 82 cents in Survey Nos.in R.S.Nos.476/13-A3 part, 476/11-B-1 Part, 476/10-A3 part and 476/9-B1 situate in the village No.189,Sholinganallur, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Chennai-600 119 from M/s.Manfa...
Madras High Court
K.Maniamma vs S.V.Govindaraju
Judges:
17 July, 2009·The appellant/defendant has filed this appeal as against the judgment and decree dated 28.8.2001 made in O.S.No.326 of 1996 on the file of Sub Court, Hosur.2.The short facts of the respondent/plaintiff's case are as follows:The appellant/defendant has borrowed a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- from the respond...
Madras High Court
Nagaraj vs The State Of Tamilnadu
Judges:
17 July, 2009·(Order of the Court was made by M.CHOCKALINGAM, J.) Challenge is made to an order of detention made by the second respondent dated 27.5.2009, whereby the brother-in-law of the petitioner by name Shanmugam @ Shanmugasundaram was ordered to be detained under the provisions of Prevention of Black Marke...
Madras High Court
M.Kuthbunisha vs S.A.Jabar
Judges:
17 July, 2009·Heard both sides.2. This Original petition is filed by the petitioner- mother under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 (for short GAWA) seeking for the custody of her minor son A.Arshath Ahamed born on 22.02.2004.3.The original petition was admitted on 11.12.2008. On notice from this Cou...
Madras High Court
Sankarapandian vs Thillai Natarajan
Judges:
17 July, 2009·The revision has been filed by the plaintiff in the suit being aggrieved against the order passed in I.A.No.2059 of 2007 in O.S.No.291 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tenkasi, wherein the Court below has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.