V.Pushpa vs P.Arumugam
Judges:
21 July, 2009·The Petitioners, who are arrayed as A3 to A5, challenge the criminal proceedings in CC.No.523/2005 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Udumalpet, initiated on the complaint launched by the Respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.2. On a perusal of the complaint,...
Madras High Court
The Special Tahsildar vs Pooncholai
Judges:
21 July, 2009·This appeal preferred under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act is directed against the judgment and award of the Subordinate Judge, Namakkal made in L.A.O.P.No.80 of 1992 dated 29.11.1995. The Land Acquisition Officer, namely the Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Namakkal is the appellant...
Madras High Court
N. Uthandavan vs The Registrar
Judges:
21 July, 2009·(made by ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J) This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 20.3.2006 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 887 of 2005. The relief sought for by the applicant before the Tribunal was to quash the orders dated 23.8.2005 and 22.9.2005 passed by the ...
Madras High Court
G.Shantha vs Vasuki
Judges:
21 July, 2009·This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the petition Order dated 19.02.2008 made in I.A.No.14300 of 2007 in O.S.No.2756 of 2007 on the file of the XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai2. The plaintiff in O.S.No.2756 of 2007 is the revision petitioner before this Court.3. O.S.No.2756 ...
Madras High Court
Radha vs Ramalingam
Judges:
21 July, 2009·Challenging the order dated 06.08.2007 made in IA No.240 of 2006 in Insolvency Petition No.1 of 2006 on the file of the learned District Judge, Cuddalore, allowing the petition thereby restraining the respondents therein from causing bodily injury or arresting, harassing or threatening the 1st respo...
Madras High Court
S.Ravindran vs The Chief Engineer (Personnel)
Judges:
21 July, 2009·The Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records relating to the respondent's proceedings made in No.053444/253/G-55/G-552/2004-1 dated 5.7.2004, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to promote the petitioner as Junior Engineer from ...
Madras High Court
Uthirapathi vs Sarangapani
Judges:
20 July, 2009·The petitioner herein have projected this Civil Revision Petition before this Court as against the order dated 25.07.2006 passed in E.A.No.60/06 in E.P.No.8/06 in O.S.No.367/92 passed by the learned District Munsif Court, Nannilam, Tiruvarur District in dismissing the petition under Section 47 Civil...
Madras High Court
Chandrasekaran vs Rajeswari Ammal
Judges:
20 July, 2009·COMMON JUDGMENT The facts which are necessary for the purpose of disposing of the above two Appeals are as follows:2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings in the suit.3. O.S.No.11 of 1999 was filed by the plaintiff, Chandrasekaran, for a permanent injunction...
Madras High Court
Billgates College Of Education vs The Registrar
Judges:
20 July, 2009·Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to dispose of the representations made by the petitioner, on 05.01.2009 and 06.07.2009....
Madras High Court
S.Ravichandran vs The Hindustan Petroleum ...
Judges:
20 July, 2009·(Order of the Court was delivered by S.J.MUKHOPADHAYA, J.) As both the writ petitions have been preferred by the same petitioner, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioner obtained a community certificate on 10th May, 1989 from the Tahsildar, Purasawalkam-Perambu...
Madras High Court
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.